WallStSmart

Nokia Corp ADR (NOK)vsRestaurant Brands International Inc (QSR)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Nokia Corp ADR generates 109% more annual revenue ($20.00B vs $9.59B). QSR leads profitability with a 10.0% profit margin vs 4.0%. QSR appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.94. QSR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 70/100 (B).

NOK

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.7Profit: 4.5Value: 5.3Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.65

QSR

Strong Buy

70

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 8.0Profit: 8.0Value: 8.0Quality: 4.3
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 0.93
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

NOKUndervalued (+16.7%)

Margin of Safety

+16.7%

Fair Value

$8.81

Current Price

$12.35

$3.54 discount

UndervaluedFair: $8.81Overvalued
QSRUndervalued (+33.6%)

Margin of Safety

+33.6%

Fair Value

$106.48

Current Price

$79.71

$26.77 discount

UndervaluedFair: $106.48Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

NOK3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Market CapQuality
$74.25B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Debt/EquityHealth
0.259/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Price/BookValuation
2.8x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

QSR4 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
100.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 100.0% YoY

Return on EquityProfitability
28.1%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 28 in profit

PEG RatioValuation
0.948/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Operating MarginProfitability
27.0%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 27.0%

Areas to Watch

NOK4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.4%4/10

2.4% revenue growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.654/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Return on EquityProfitability
3.7%3/10

ROE of 3.7% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
4.0%3/10

4.0% margin — thin

QSR2 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
25.4x4/10

Moderate valuation

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.932/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : NOK

The strongest argument for NOK centers on Market Cap, Debt/Equity, Price/Book. PEG of 1.15 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : QSR

The strongest argument for QSR centers on EPS Growth, Return on Equity, PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.94 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : NOK

The primary concerns for NOK are Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity. A P/E of 83.1x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 4.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : QSR

The primary concerns for QSR are P/E Ratio, Altman Z-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

NOK carries more volatility with a beta of 0.77 — expect wider price swings.

QSR is growing revenue faster at 7.3% — sustainability is the question.

NOK generates stronger free cash flow (629M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

QSR scores higher overall (70/100 vs 40/100). NOK offers better value entry with a 16.7% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Nokia Corp ADR

TECHNOLOGY · COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT · USA

Nokia Corporation offers fixed and mobile network solutions globally. The company is headquartered in Espoo, Finland.

Visit Website →

Restaurant Brands International Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESTAURANTS · USA

Restaurant Brands International Inc. owns, operates and franchises quick-service restaurants under the Tim Hortons (TH), Burger King (BK) and Popeyes (PLK) brands. The company is headquartered in Toronto, Canada.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?