WallStSmart

Nokia Corp ADR (NOK)vsQnity Electronics, Inc (Q)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Nokia Corp ADR generates 318% more annual revenue ($19.89B vs $4.75B). Q leads profitability with a 14.6% profit margin vs 3.3%. NOK appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.83. Q earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 49/100 (D+).

NOK

Hold

46

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.7Profit: 4.5Value: 4.7Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.60

Q

Hold

49

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 3.3Profit: 6.0Value: 7.3Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

NOKSignificantly Overvalued (-734.1%)

Margin of Safety

-734.1%

Fair Value

$0.88

Current Price

$8.41

$7.53 premium

UndervaluedFair: $0.88Overvalued
QSignificantly Overvalued (-410.3%)

Margin of Safety

-410.3%

Fair Value

$22.44

Current Price

$120.26

$97.82 premium

UndervaluedFair: $22.44Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

NOK3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Debt/EquityHealth
0.259/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

PEG RatioValuation
0.838/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
1.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Q1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Operating MarginProfitability
20.4%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 20.4%

Areas to Watch

NOK4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.4%4/10

2.4% revenue growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.604/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Return on EquityProfitability
3.0%3/10

ROE of 3.0% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
3.3%3/10

3.3% margin — thin

Q4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.414/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
35.9x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Return on EquityProfitability
8.0%3/10

ROE of 8.0% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-52.8%2/10

Earnings declined 52.8%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : NOK

The strongest argument for NOK centers on Debt/Equity, PEG Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 0.83 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : Q

The strongest argument for Q centers on Operating Margin.

Bear Case : NOK

The primary concerns for NOK are Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity. A P/E of 63.5x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 3.3% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : Q

The primary concerns for Q are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Return on Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

Q is growing revenue faster at 8.1% — sustainability is the question.

Q generates stronger free cash flow (420M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

Q scores higher overall (49/100 vs 46/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Nokia Corp ADR

TECHNOLOGY · COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT · USA

Nokia Corporation offers fixed and mobile network solutions globally. The company is headquartered in Espoo, Finland.

Visit Website →

Qnity Electronics, Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SEMICONDUCTOR EQUIPMENT & MATERIALS · USA

IQVIA Holdings Inc. provides integrated information and technology-enabled healthcare services in the Americas, Europe, Africa, and Asia-Pacific. The company is headquartered in Durham, North Carolina.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?