WallStSmart

Nokia Corp ADR (NOK)vsOmnicom Group Inc (OMC)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Nokia Corp ADR generates 15% more annual revenue ($19.89B vs $17.27B). NOK leads profitability with a 3.3% profit margin vs -0.3%. NOK appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.83. OMC earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 49/100 (D+).

NOK

Hold

46

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.7Profit: 4.5Value: 4.7Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.60

OMC

Hold

49

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 4.5Value: 4.0Quality: 3.5
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 0.76
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

NOKSignificantly Overvalued (-734.1%)

Margin of Safety

-734.1%

Fair Value

$0.88

Current Price

$8.41

$7.53 premium

UndervaluedFair: $0.88Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for OMC.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

NOK3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Debt/EquityHealth
0.259/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

PEG RatioValuation
0.838/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
1.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

OMC3 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
27.9%8/10

Revenue surging 27.9% year-over-year

Free Cash FlowQuality
$3.00B8/10

Generating 3.0B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

NOK4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.4%4/10

2.4% revenue growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.604/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Return on EquityProfitability
3.0%3/10

ROE of 3.0% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
3.3%3/10

3.3% margin — thin

OMC4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
0.5%3/10

ROE of 0.5% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
15.972/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-10.3%2/10

Earnings declined 10.3%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : NOK

The strongest argument for NOK centers on Debt/Equity, PEG Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 0.83 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : OMC

The strongest argument for OMC centers on Price/Book, Revenue Growth, Free Cash Flow. Revenue growth of 27.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : NOK

The primary concerns for NOK are Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity. A P/E of 63.5x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 3.3% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : OMC

The primary concerns for OMC are Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

NOK profiles as a value stock while OMC is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

OMC carries more volatility with a beta of 0.71 — expect wider price swings.

OMC is growing revenue faster at 27.9% — sustainability is the question.

OMC generates stronger free cash flow (3.0B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

OMC scores higher overall (49/100 vs 46/100) and 27.9% revenue growth. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Nokia Corp ADR

TECHNOLOGY · COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT · USA

Nokia Corporation offers fixed and mobile network solutions globally. The company is headquartered in Espoo, Finland.

Visit Website →

Omnicom Group Inc

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ADVERTISING AGENCIES · USA

Omnicom Group Inc. is an American global media, marketing and corporate communications holding company, headquartered in New York City.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?