WallStSmart

Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC)vsRaytheon Technologies Corp (RTX)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Raytheon Technologies Corp generates 111% more annual revenue ($88.60B vs $41.95B). NOC leads profitability with a 10.0% profit margin vs 7.6%. RTX appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.89. NOC earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 56/100 (C).

NOC

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 6.0Profit: 7.5Value: 6.7Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.96

RTX

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 6.0Profit: 5.5Value: 4.7Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 1.55
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

NOCUndervalued (+25.0%)

Margin of Safety

+25.0%

Fair Value

$904.66

Current Price

$724.84

$179.82 discount

UndervaluedFair: $904.66Overvalued
RTXSignificantly Overvalued (-101.1%)

Margin of Safety

-101.1%

Fair Value

$99.80

Current Price

$204.56

$104.76 premium

UndervaluedFair: $99.80Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

NOC3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Market CapQuality
$105.04B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
26.2%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 26 in profit

Free Cash FlowQuality
$3.23B8/10

Generating 3.2B in free cash flow

RTX2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Market CapQuality
$277.35B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Free Cash FlowQuality
$3.19B8/10

Generating 3.2B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

NOC4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
P/E RatioValuation
25.3x4/10

Moderate valuation

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.964/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Debt/EquityHealth
1.183/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

RTX4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.554/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Profit MarginProfitability
7.6%3/10

7.6% margin — thin

PEG RatioValuation
2.892/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
41.5x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : NOC

The strongest argument for NOC centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : RTX

The strongest argument for RTX centers on Market Cap, Free Cash Flow. Revenue growth of 12.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : NOC

The primary concerns for NOC are P/E Ratio, Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : RTX

The primary concerns for RTX are Altman Z-Score, Profit Margin, PEG Ratio. A P/E of 41.5x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

RTX carries more volatility with a beta of 0.41 — expect wider price swings.

RTX is growing revenue faster at 12.1% — sustainability is the question.

NOC generates stronger free cash flow (3.2B), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor AEROSPACE & DEFENSE industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

NOC scores higher overall (56/100 vs 55/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Northrop Grumman Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · AEROSPACE & DEFENSE · USA

Northrop Grumman Corporation (NYSE: NOC) is an American multinational aerospace and defense technology company.

Visit Website →

Raytheon Technologies Corp

INDUSTRIALS · AEROSPACE & DEFENSE · USA

Raytheon Technologies Corporation is an American multinational aerospace and defense conglomerate headquartered in Waltham, Massachusetts. It is one of the largest aerospace, intelligence services providers, and defense manufacturers in the world by revenue and market capitalization. Raytheon Technologies (RTX) researches, develops, and manufactures advanced technology products in the aerospace and defense industry, including aircraft engines, avionics, aerostructures, cybersecurity, guided missiles, air defense systems, satellites, and drones.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?