WallStSmart

Netflix Inc (NFLX)vsQMMM Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (QMMM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Netflix Inc generates 2407992% more annual revenue ($45.18B vs $1.88M). NFLX leads profitability with a 24.3% profit margin vs -1.5%. NFLX earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 70/100 (B).

NFLX

Strong Buy

70

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 8.7Profit: 9.0Value: 9.3Quality: 8.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 3.27

QMMM

Avoid

14

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.7Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 8.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 4.39
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

NFLXUndervalued (+22.1%)

Margin of Safety

+22.1%

Fair Value

$118.40

Current Price

$92.28

$26.12 discount

UndervaluedFair: $118.40Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for QMMM.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

NFLX6 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
Market CapQuality
$385.67B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Return on EquityProfitability
42.8%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 43 in profit

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.2710/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Profit MarginProfitability
24.3%9/10

Keeps 24 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
24.5%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 24.5%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
17.6%8/10

17.6% revenue growth

QMMM2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Debt/EquityHealth
0.0210/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.3910/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Areas to Watch

NFLX3 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.924/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
35.9x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
14.6x4/10

Trading at 14.6x book value

QMMM4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Price/BookValuation
519.1x2/10

Trading at 519.1x book value

Return on EquityProfitability
-2.0%2/10

ROE of -2.0% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : NFLX

The strongest argument for NFLX centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Altman Z-Score. Profitability is solid with margins at 24.3% and operating margin at 24.5%. Revenue growth of 17.6% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : QMMM

The strongest argument for QMMM centers on Debt/Equity, Altman Z-Score.

Bear Case : NFLX

The primary concerns for NFLX are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Bear Case : QMMM

The primary concerns for QMMM are EPS Growth, Piotroski F-Score, Price/Book.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

NFLX profiles as a growth stock while QMMM is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

NFLX is growing revenue faster at 17.6% — sustainability is the question.

NFLX generates stronger free cash flow (1.9B), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor ENTERTAINMENT industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

NFLX scores higher overall (70/100 vs 14/100), backed by strong 24.3% margins and 17.6% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Netflix Inc

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ENTERTAINMENT · USA

Netflix, Inc. is an American over-the-top content platform and production company headquartered in Los Gatos, California. Netflix was founded in 1997 by Reed Hastings and Marc Randolph in Scotts Valley, California. The company's primary business is a subscription-based streaming service offering online streaming from a library of films and television series, including those produced in-house.

Visit Website →

QMMM Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ADVERTISING AGENCIES · USA

QMMM Holdings Limited, provides digital media advertising and marketing production services primarily in Hong Kong.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?