WallStSmart

Namib Minerals Ordinary Shares (NAMM)vsSociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA ADR B (SQM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA ADR B generates 6316% more annual revenue ($5.30B vs $82.59M). NAMM leads profitability with a 122.5% profit margin vs 15.4%. NAMM trades at a lower P/E of 1.0x. SQM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 74/100 (B).

NAMM

Hold

43

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 6.7Profit: 8.0Value: 6.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 7.98

SQM

Strong Buy

74

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 7.3Profit: 7.5Value: 7.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.05

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

NAMM5 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
1.0x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Profit MarginProfitability
122.5%10/10

Keeps 123 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
31.6%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 31.6%

Debt/EquityHealth
-0.1310/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
7.9810/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

SQM4 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.3610/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Operating MarginProfitability
41.1%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 41.1%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
69.8%10/10

Revenue surging 69.8% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
165.2%10/10

Earnings expanding 165.2% YoY

Areas to Watch

NAMM4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$95.89M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
0.0%3/10

ROE of 0.0% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

SQM1 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
27.9x4/10

Moderate valuation

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : NAMM

The strongest argument for NAMM centers on P/E Ratio, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 122.5% and operating margin at 31.6%.

Bull Case : SQM

The strongest argument for SQM centers on PEG Ratio, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.4% and operating margin at 41.1%. Revenue growth of 69.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : NAMM

The primary concerns for NAMM are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : SQM

The primary concerns for SQM are P/E Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

NAMM profiles as a mature stock while SQM is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

SQM carries more volatility with a beta of 0.97 — expect wider price swings.

SQM is growing revenue faster at 69.8% — sustainability is the question.

SQM generates stronger free cash flow (679M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

SQM scores higher overall (74/100 vs 43/100), backed by strong 15.4% margins and 69.8% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Namib Minerals Ordinary Shares

BASIC MATERIALS · GOLD · USA

Namib Minerals engages in the production, development, and exploration of gold and critical green metals.

Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA ADR B

BASIC MATERIALS · SPECIALTY CHEMICALS · USA

Sociedad Qumica y Minera de Chile SA produces and distributes specialty plant nutrients, iodine and its derivatives, lithium and its derivatives, potassium chloride and sulfate, industrial chemicals and other products and services worldwide. The company is headquartered in Santiago, Chile.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?