Monster Beverage Corp (MNST)vsConstellation Brands Inc Class A (STZ)
MNST
Monster Beverage Corp
$97.74
-0.52%
CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · Cap: $93.57B
STZ
Constellation Brands Inc Class A
$131.75
-0.20%
CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · Cap: $22.69B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Constellation Brands Inc Class A generates 3% more annual revenue ($9.06B vs $8.79B). MNST leads profitability with a 23.1% profit margin vs 20.1%. STZ appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.53. STZ earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 72/100 (B).
MNST
Strong Buy69
out of 100
Grade: B-
STZ
Strong Buy72
out of 100
Grade: B
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+65.3%
Fair Value
$281.82
Current Price
$97.74
$184.08 discount
Intrinsic value data unavailable for STZ.
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Strong operational efficiency at 31.0%
Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk
Large-cap with strong market position
Every $100 of equity generates 23 in profit
Keeps 23 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Revenue surging 26.9% year-over-year
Strong operational efficiency at 35.9%
Every $100 of equity generates 22 in profit
Keeps 20 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
Earnings expanding 30.7% YoY
Areas to Watch
Trading at 11.0x book value
Expensive relative to growth rate
Premium valuation, high expectations priced in
Elevated debt levels
Expensive relative to growth rate
Revenue declined 3.3%
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : MNST
The strongest argument for MNST centers on Operating Margin, Altman Z-Score, Market Cap. Profitability is solid with margins at 23.1% and operating margin at 31.0%. Revenue growth of 26.9% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bull Case : STZ
The strongest argument for STZ centers on Operating Margin, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 20.1% and operating margin at 35.9%.
Bear Case : MNST
The primary concerns for MNST are Price/Book, PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 46.2x leaves little room for execution misses.
Bear Case : STZ
The primary concerns for STZ are Debt/Equity, PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
MNST profiles as a growth stock while STZ is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.
MNST carries more volatility with a beta of 0.53 — expect wider price swings.
MNST is growing revenue faster at 26.9% — sustainability is the question.
MNST generates stronger free cash flow (584M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
STZ scores higher overall (72/100 vs 69/100), backed by strong 20.1% margins. MNST offers better value entry with a 65.3% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Strong Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Monster Beverage Corp
CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · BEVERAGES - NON-ALCOHOLIC · USA
Monster Beverage Corporation is an American beverage company that manufactures energy drinks including Monster Energy, Relentless and Burn.
Visit Website →Constellation Brands Inc Class A
CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · BEVERAGES - BREWERS · USA
Constellation Brands, Inc., headquartered in Victor, New York, is an American producer and marketer of beer, wine, and spirits.
Visit Website →Compare with Other BEVERAGES - NON-ALCOHOLIC Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?