WallStSmart

Masco Corporation (MAS)vsYum! Brands Inc (YUM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Yum! Brands Inc generates 11% more annual revenue ($8.49B vs $7.68B). YUM leads profitability with a 20.5% profit margin vs 10.9%. MAS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.87. MAS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 67/100 (B-).

MAS

Strong Buy

67

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 8.5Value: 5.0Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.35

YUM

Buy

65

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 8.0Profit: 8.0Value: 4.0Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.92
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for MAS.

YUMSignificantly Overvalued (-88.1%)

Margin of Safety

-88.1%

Fair Value

$84.55

Current Price

$150.87

$66.32 premium

UndervaluedFair: $84.55Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

MAS3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Return on EquityProfitability
84.6%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 85 in profit

Debt/EquityHealth
-13.6410/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

EPS GrowthGrowth
20.0%8/10

Earnings expanding 20.0% YoY

YUM5 strengths · Avg: 9.4/10
Operating MarginProfitability
31.1%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 31.1%

EPS GrowthGrowth
72.2%10/10

Earnings expanding 72.2% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
-1.6410/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Profit MarginProfitability
20.5%9/10

Keeps 21 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Revenue GrowthGrowth
15.2%8/10

15.2% revenue growth

Areas to Watch

MAS2 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.874/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-113.00M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

YUM4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.914/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
0.0%3/10

ROE of 0.0% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.922/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : MAS

The strongest argument for MAS centers on Return on Equity, Debt/Equity, EPS Growth.

Bull Case : YUM

The strongest argument for YUM centers on Operating Margin, EPS Growth, Debt/Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 20.5% and operating margin at 31.1%. Revenue growth of 15.2% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : MAS

The primary concerns for MAS are PEG Ratio, Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : YUM

The primary concerns for YUM are PEG Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

MAS profiles as a value stock while YUM is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

MAS carries more volatility with a beta of 1.31 — expect wider price swings.

YUM is growing revenue faster at 15.2% — sustainability is the question.

YUM generates stronger free cash flow (341M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

MAS scores higher overall (67/100 vs 65/100). Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Masco Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · BUILDING PRODUCTS & EQUIPMENT · USA

Masco Corporation is a manufacturer of products for the home improvement and new home construction markets.

Visit Website →

Yum! Brands Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESTAURANTS · USA

Yum! Brands, Inc. is an American fast food corporation listed on the Fortune 1000. Yum! operates the brands KFC, Pizza Hut, Taco Bell, The Habit Burger Grill, and WingStreet worldwide, except in China, where the brands are operated by a separate company, Yum China.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?