WallStSmart

Masco Corporation (MAS)vsWPP PLC ADR (WPP)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

WPP PLC ADR generates 76% more annual revenue ($13.55B vs $7.68B). MAS leads profitability with a 10.9% profit margin vs -1.6%. MAS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.87. MAS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 67/100 (B-).

MAS

Strong Buy

67

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 8.5Value: 5.0Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.35

WPP

Avoid

34

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 4.0Value: 5.7Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.73
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for MAS.

WPPUndervalued (+68.8%)

Margin of Safety

+68.8%

Fair Value

$58.66

Current Price

$17.70

$40.96 discount

UndervaluedFair: $58.66Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

MAS3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Return on EquityProfitability
84.6%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 85 in profit

Debt/EquityHealth
-13.6410/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

EPS GrowthGrowth
20.0%8/10

Earnings expanding 20.0% YoY

WPP1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.71B8/10

Generating 1.7B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

MAS2 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.874/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-113.00M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

WPP4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
2.2%3/10

Operating margin of 2.2%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
4.232/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-8.3%2/10

Revenue declined 8.3%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : MAS

The strongest argument for MAS centers on Return on Equity, Debt/Equity, EPS Growth.

Bull Case : WPP

The strongest argument for WPP centers on Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : MAS

The primary concerns for MAS are PEG Ratio, Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : WPP

The primary concerns for WPP are Operating Margin, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. Debt-to-equity of 2.69 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

MAS profiles as a value stock while WPP is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

MAS carries more volatility with a beta of 1.31 — expect wider price swings.

MAS is growing revenue faster at 6.5% — sustainability is the question.

WPP generates stronger free cash flow (1.7B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

MAS scores higher overall (67/100 vs 34/100). WPP offers better value entry with a 68.8% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Masco Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · BUILDING PRODUCTS & EQUIPMENT · USA

Masco Corporation is a manufacturer of products for the home improvement and new home construction markets.

Visit Website →

WPP PLC ADR

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ADVERTISING AGENCIES · USA

WPP plc, a creative transformation company, provides communications, expertise, trade and technology services in North America, the UK, Western Continental Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, Africa, the Middle East, and Central and Eastern Europe. The company is headquartered in London, the United Kingdom.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?