WallStSmart

Life Time Group Holdings Inc (LTH)vsNOMADAR Corp. Class A Common Stock (NOMA)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Life Time Group Holdings Inc generates 338083% more annual revenue ($3.00B vs $885,690). LTH leads profitability with a 12.5% profit margin vs -2.1%. LTH earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 66/100 (B-).

LTH

Strong Buy

66

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 6.0Profit: 6.5Value: 8.3Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 0.89

NOMA

Avoid

14

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.3Profit: 3.0Value: 5.0Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

LTHUndervalued (+61.8%)

Margin of Safety

+61.8%

Fair Value

$77.69

Current Price

$26.42

$51.27 discount

UndervaluedFair: $77.69Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for NOMA.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

LTH2 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
15.6x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

NOMA0 strengths · Avg: 0/10

No standout strengths identified

Areas to Watch

LTH4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
2.2%4/10

2.2% earnings growth

Debt/EquityHealth
1.383/10

Elevated debt levels

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-64.64M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.892/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

NOMA4 concerns · Avg: 3.8/10
Price/BookValuation
9.5x4/10

Trading at 9.5x book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% revenue growth

EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$62.51M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : LTH

The strongest argument for LTH centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 12.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : NOMA

NOMA has a balanced fundamental profile.

Bear Case : LTH

The primary concerns for LTH are EPS Growth, Debt/Equity, Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : NOMA

The primary concerns for NOMA are Price/Book, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

LTH profiles as a value stock while NOMA is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

LTH is growing revenue faster at 12.3% — sustainability is the question.

NOMA generates stronger free cash flow (-2M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor LEISURE industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

LTH scores higher overall (66/100 vs 14/100) and 12.3% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Life Time Group Holdings Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · LEISURE · USA

Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. offers health, fitness and wellness experiences to a community of individual members in the United States and Canada. The company is headquartered in Chanhassen, Minnesota.

NOMADAR Corp. Class A Common Stock

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · LEISURE · USA

Nomadar Corp. (NOMA) is a pioneering force in the travel technology industry, committed to revolutionizing customer experiences through cutting-edge digital platforms and efficient travel management solutions. With a diverse portfolio designed to adapt to the dynamic needs of travelers and businesses, Nomadar is well-positioned to leverage the growing demand for technology-driven travel services. Backed by a seasoned leadership team and robust partnerships, the company adeptly navigates market trends to foster sustainable growth. As Nomadar enhances its footprint in the global travel sector, it remains steadfast in its mission to deliver innovative, customer-focused solutions that bolster shareholder value.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?