WallStSmart

LG Display Co Ltd (LPL)vsUber Technologies Inc (UBER)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

LG Display Co Ltd generates 45718% more annual revenue ($25.30T vs $55.23B). UBER leads profitability with a 17.3% profit margin vs -5.3%. UBER appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 6.15. UBER earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

LPL

Hold

36

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.7Profit: 2.5Value: 4.0Quality: 3.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 1.25

UBER

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 8.0Profit: 7.5Value: 5.3Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.47
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for LPL.

UBERUndervalued (+1.8%)

Margin of Safety

+1.8%

Fair Value

$71.76

Current Price

$69.93

$1.83 discount

UndervaluedFair: $71.76Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

LPL2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.7x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$690.95B10/10

Generating 691.0B in free cash flow

UBER5 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
35.1%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 35 in profit

EPS GrowthGrowth
85.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 85.5% YoY

Market CapQuality
$146.39B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

P/E RatioValuation
15.9x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Free Cash FlowQuality
$2.79B8/10

Generating 2.8B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

LPL4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.4%4/10

0.4% revenue growth

PEG RatioValuation
6.562/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-1.3%2/10

ROE of -1.3% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-76.3%2/10

Earnings declined 76.3%

UBER2 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
6.152/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.472/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : LPL

The strongest argument for LPL centers on Price/Book, Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : UBER

The strongest argument for UBER centers on Return on Equity, EPS Growth, Market Cap. Profitability is solid with margins at 17.3% and operating margin at 13.3%. Revenue growth of 12.2% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : LPL

The primary concerns for LPL are Revenue Growth, PEG Ratio, Return on Equity. Debt-to-equity of 2.13 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : UBER

The primary concerns for UBER are PEG Ratio, Altman Z-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

LPL profiles as a turnaround stock while UBER is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

LPL carries more volatility with a beta of 1.32 — expect wider price swings.

UBER is growing revenue faster at 12.2% — sustainability is the question.

LPL generates stronger free cash flow (691.0B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

UBER scores higher overall (64/100 vs 36/100), backed by strong 17.3% margins and 12.2% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

LG Display Co Ltd

TECHNOLOGY · CONSUMER ELECTRONICS · USA

LG Display Co., Ltd. is dedicated to the design, manufacture and sale of thin film transistor liquid crystal displays (TFT-LCD) and display panels based on organic light emitting diode (OLED) technology. The company is headquartered in Seoul, South Korea.

Uber Technologies Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - APPLICATION · USA

Uber Technologies, Inc., commonly known as Uber, is an American technology company. Its services include ride-hailing, food delivery (Uber Eats), package delivery, couriers, freight transportation, and, through a partnership with Lime, electric bicycle and motorized scooter rental. The company is based in San Francisco, California.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?