WallStSmart

LG Display Co Ltd (LPL)vsPalo Alto Networks Inc (PANW)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

LG Display Co Ltd generates 267167% more annual revenue ($26.44T vs $9.89B). PANW leads profitability with a 13.0% profit margin vs -1.3%. PANW appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.96. PANW earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 58/100 (C).

LPL

Hold

38

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.7Profit: 3.5Value: 4.0Quality: 3.8
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 0.82

PANW

Buy

58

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 8.0Profit: 7.0Value: 2.0Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.02
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for LPL.

PANWSignificantly Overvalued (-81.9%)

Margin of Safety

-81.9%

Fair Value

$84.24

Current Price

$153.22

$68.98 premium

UndervaluedFair: $84.24Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

LPL2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.0x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.18T10/10

Generating 1.2T in free cash flow

PANW3 strengths · Avg: 9.7/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
60.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 60.5% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0410/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Market CapQuality
$128.28B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Areas to Watch

LPL4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.0%4/10

2.0% revenue growth

PEG RatioValuation
6.562/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-2.3%2/10

ROE of -2.3% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-76.3%2/10

Earnings declined 76.3%

PANW4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Price/BookValuation
11.5x4/10

Trading at 11.5x book value

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
2.962/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
87.3x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : LPL

The strongest argument for LPL centers on Price/Book, Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : PANW

The strongest argument for PANW centers on EPS Growth, Debt/Equity, Market Cap. Revenue growth of 14.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : LPL

The primary concerns for LPL are Revenue Growth, PEG Ratio, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : PANW

The primary concerns for PANW are Price/Book, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. A P/E of 87.3x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

LPL profiles as a turnaround stock while PANW is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

LPL carries more volatility with a beta of 1.16 — expect wider price swings.

PANW is growing revenue faster at 14.9% — sustainability is the question.

LPL generates stronger free cash flow (1.2T), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

PANW scores higher overall (58/100 vs 38/100) and 14.9% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

LG Display Co Ltd

TECHNOLOGY · CONSUMER ELECTRONICS · USA

LG Display Co., Ltd. is dedicated to the design, manufacture and sale of thin film transistor liquid crystal displays (TFT-LCD) and display panels based on organic light emitting diode (OLED) technology. The company is headquartered in Seoul, South Korea.

Palo Alto Networks Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. provides cybersecurity platform solutions globally. The company is headquartered in Santa Clara, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?