WallStSmart

Cheniere Energy Inc (LNG)vsWilliams Companies Inc (WMB)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Cheniere Energy Inc generates 70% more annual revenue ($20.92B vs $12.32B). WMB leads profitability with a 24.9% profit margin vs 13.9%. WMB appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.07. LNG earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 70/100 (B).

LNG

Strong Buy

70

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 6.7Profit: 8.5Value: 4.3Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 1.58

WMB

Strong Buy

69

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 6.7Profit: 8.0Value: 5.0Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 0.34

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

LNG5 strengths · Avg: 9.4/10
Return on EquityProfitability
47.1%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 47 in profit

Operating MarginProfitability
75.0%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 75.0%

EPS GrowthGrowth
100.7%10/10

Earnings expanding 100.7% YoY

Market CapQuality
$57.49B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Revenue GrowthGrowth
22.7%8/10

Revenue surging 22.7% year-over-year

WMB5 strengths · Avg: 9.4/10
Operating MarginProfitability
39.5%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 39.5%

EPS GrowthGrowth
51.2%10/10

Earnings expanding 51.2% YoY

Market CapQuality
$89.11B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
23.3%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 23 in profit

Profit MarginProfitability
24.9%9/10

Keeps 25 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Areas to Watch

LNG4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Price/BookValuation
9.3x4/10

Trading at 9.3x book value

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.584/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

PEG RatioValuation
10.762/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Debt/EquityHealth
4.291/10

Elevated debt levels

WMB4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.074/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
29.0x4/10

Moderate valuation

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-458.00M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.342/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : LNG

The strongest argument for LNG centers on Return on Equity, Operating Margin, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 22.7% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : WMB

The strongest argument for WMB centers on Operating Margin, EPS Growth, Market Cap. Profitability is solid with margins at 24.9% and operating margin at 39.5%.

Bear Case : LNG

The primary concerns for LNG are Price/Book, Altman Z-Score, PEG Ratio. Debt-to-equity of 4.29 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : WMB

The primary concerns for WMB are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Free Cash Flow. Debt-to-equity of 2.33 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

LNG profiles as a growth stock while WMB is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

WMB carries more volatility with a beta of 0.62 — expect wider price swings.

LNG is growing revenue faster at 22.7% — sustainability is the question.

LNG generates stronger free cash flow (842M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

LNG scores higher overall (70/100 vs 69/100) and 22.7% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Strong Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Cheniere Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM · USA

Cheniere Energy, Inc., an energy infrastructure company, is involved in business related to liquefied natural gas (LNG) in the United States. The company is headquartered in Houston, Texas.

Visit Website →

Williams Companies Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM · USA

The Williams Companies, Inc., is an American energy company based in Tulsa, Oklahoma. Its core business is natural gas processing and transportation, with additional petroleum and electricity generation assets.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?