WallStSmart

Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT)vsUnilever PLC ADR (UL)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Lockheed Martin Corporation generates 49% more annual revenue ($75.05B vs $50.50B). UL leads profitability with a 18.8% profit margin vs 6.7%. LMT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.34. LMT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 65/100 (C+).

LMT

Buy

65

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 6.5Value: 10.0Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.09

UL

Buy

50

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 2.0Profit: 8.5Value: 7.3Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

LMTUndervalued (+37.5%)

Margin of Safety

+37.5%

Fair Value

$1005.26

Current Price

$624.20

$381.06 discount

UndervaluedFair: $1005.26Overvalued
ULSignificantly Overvalued (-268.2%)

Margin of Safety

-268.2%

Fair Value

$20.26

Current Price

$60.80

$40.54 premium

UndervaluedFair: $20.26Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

LMT3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
76.9%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 77 in profit

Market CapQuality
$144.44B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Free Cash FlowQuality
$2.76B8/10

Generating 2.8B in free cash flow

UL4 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
31.0%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 31 in profit

Market CapQuality
$132.46B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Operating MarginProfitability
20.1%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 20.1%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$5.48B8/10

Generating 5.5B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

LMT4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
P/E RatioValuation
29.1x4/10

Moderate valuation

EPS GrowthGrowth
1.6%4/10

1.6% earnings growth

Profit MarginProfitability
6.7%3/10

6.7% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

UL3 concerns · Avg: 2.7/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.914/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-3.2%2/10

Revenue declined 3.2%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-3.4%2/10

Earnings declined 3.4%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : LMT

The strongest argument for LMT centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap, Free Cash Flow. PEG of 1.34 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : UL

The strongest argument for UL centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 18.8% and operating margin at 20.1%.

Bear Case : LMT

The primary concerns for LMT are P/E Ratio, EPS Growth, Profit Margin. Debt-to-equity of 3.23 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : UL

The primary concerns for UL are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

LMT profiles as a value stock while UL is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

UL carries more volatility with a beta of 0.26 — expect wider price swings.

LMT is growing revenue faster at 9.1% — sustainability is the question.

UL generates stronger free cash flow (5.5B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

LMT scores higher overall (65/100 vs 50/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Lockheed Martin Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · AEROSPACE & DEFENSE · USA

Lockheed Martin Corporation is an American aerospace, defense, information security, and technology company with worldwide interests. It is headquartered in North Bethesda, Maryland, in the Washington, D.C., area.

Visit Website →

Unilever PLC ADR

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS · USA

Unilever PLC is a fast moving consumer goods company in Asia, Africa, the Middle East, Turkey, Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, America and Europe. The company is headquartered in London, the United Kingdom.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?