WallStSmart

Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT)vsTwin Disc Incorporated (TWIN)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Lockheed Martin Corporation generates 21476% more annual revenue ($75.11B vs $348.10M). LMT leads profitability with a 6.4% profit margin vs 6.3%. LMT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.08. TWIN earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 55/100 (C-).

LMT

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 3.3Profit: 6.5Value: 4.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.09

TWIN

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 7.3Profit: 4.5Value: 7.3Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

LMTSignificantly Overvalued (-37.4%)

Margin of Safety

-37.4%

Fair Value

$457.50

Current Price

$517.97

$60.47 premium

UndervaluedFair: $457.50Overvalued
TWINUndervalued (+48.4%)

Margin of Safety

+48.4%

Fair Value

$33.40

Current Price

$16.52

$16.88 discount

UndervaluedFair: $33.40Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

LMT2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
67.6%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 68 in profit

Market CapQuality
$119.43B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

TWIN3 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
10.7x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.3x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
2239.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 2239.0% YoY

Areas to Watch

LMT4 concerns · Avg: 3.8/10
P/E RatioValuation
25.1x4/10

Moderate valuation

Price/BookValuation
15.9x4/10

Trading at 15.9x book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.3%4/10

0.3% revenue growth

Profit MarginProfitability
6.4%3/10

6.4% margin — thin

TWIN4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.3%4/10

0.3% revenue growth

Market CapQuality
$260.45M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
6.3%3/10

6.3% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
1.5%3/10

Operating margin of 1.5%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : LMT

The strongest argument for LMT centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap. PEG of 1.08 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : TWIN

The strongest argument for TWIN centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : LMT

The primary concerns for LMT are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Revenue Growth. Debt-to-equity of 3.23 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : TWIN

The primary concerns for TWIN are Revenue Growth, Market Cap, Profit Margin.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

TWIN carries more volatility with a beta of 0.72 — expect wider price swings.

TWIN is growing revenue faster at 0.3% — sustainability is the question.

TWIN generates stronger free cash flow (1M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor AEROSPACE & DEFENSE industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

LMT scores higher overall (55/100 vs 55/100). TWIN offers better value entry with a 48.4% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Lockheed Martin Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · AEROSPACE & DEFENSE · USA

Lockheed Martin Corporation is an American aerospace, defense, information security, and technology company with worldwide interests. It is headquartered in North Bethesda, Maryland, in the Washington, D.C., area.

Visit Website →

Twin Disc Incorporated

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY · USA

Twin Disc, Incorporated designs, manufactures and sells power transmission equipment for off-highway and marine use worldwide. The company is headquartered in Racine, Wisconsin.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?