WallStSmart

Live Ventures Inc (LIVE)vsRush Enterprises B Inc (RUSHB)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Rush Enterprises B Inc generates 1566% more annual revenue ($7.24B vs $434.25M). RUSHB leads profitability with a 3.7% profit margin vs -0.6%. RUSHB earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 45/100 (D).

LIVE

Avoid

30

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.0Profit: 3.5Value: 6.7Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.02

RUSHB

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 3.3Profit: 5.5Value: 4.0Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 3.34
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

LIVEUndervalued (+85.9%)

Margin of Safety

+85.9%

Fair Value

$138.16

Current Price

$8.08

$130.08 discount

UndervaluedFair: $138.16Overvalued
RUSHBOvervalued (-9.1%)

Margin of Safety

-9.1%

Fair Value

$59.95

Current Price

$49.88

$10.07 premium

UndervaluedFair: $59.95Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

LIVE1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.3x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

RUSHB2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.3410/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Price/BookValuation
1.7x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

LIVE4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Market CapQuality
$26.94M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
4.2%3/10

ROE of 4.2% — below average capital efficiency

Operating MarginProfitability
4.8%3/10

Operating margin of 4.8%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-3.2%2/10

Revenue declined 3.2%

RUSHB4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
1.1%4/10

1.1% earnings growth

Profit MarginProfitability
3.7%3/10

3.7% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
2.742/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : LIVE

The strongest argument for LIVE centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : RUSHB

The strongest argument for RUSHB centers on Altman Z-Score, Price/Book.

Bear Case : LIVE

The primary concerns for LIVE are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Operating Margin. Debt-to-equity of 2.44 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : RUSHB

The primary concerns for RUSHB are EPS Growth, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score. Thin 3.7% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

LIVE profiles as a turnaround stock while RUSHB is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

LIVE carries more volatility with a beta of 1.03 — expect wider price swings.

RUSHB is growing revenue faster at -1.6% — sustainability is the question.

RUSHB generates stronger free cash flow (51M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

RUSHB scores higher overall (45/100 vs 30/100). LIVE offers better value entry with a 85.9% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Live Ventures Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · HOME IMPROVEMENT RETAIL · USA

Live Ventures Incorporated is engaged in flooring manufacturing, steel fabrication and retail businesses in the United States. The company is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada.

Visit Website →

Rush Enterprises B Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO & TRUCK DEALERSHIPS · USA

Rush Enterprises, Inc. is an integrated retailer of commercial vehicles and related services in the United States. The company is headquartered in New Braunfels, Texas.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?