WallStSmart

Live Ventures Inc (LIVE)vsRestaurant Brands International Inc (QSR)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Restaurant Brands International Inc generates 2134% more annual revenue ($9.70B vs $434.25M). QSR leads profitability with a 13.1% profit margin vs -0.6%. QSR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 68/100 (B-).

LIVE

Avoid

30

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.0Profit: 3.5Value: 6.7Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.02

QSR

Strong Buy

68

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 7.3Profit: 8.0Value: 6.7Quality: 3.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 0.90
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

LIVEUndervalued (+85.9%)

Margin of Safety

+85.9%

Fair Value

$138.16

Current Price

$8.08

$130.08 discount

UndervaluedFair: $138.16Overvalued
QSRUndervalued (+25.1%)

Margin of Safety

+25.1%

Fair Value

$94.35

Current Price

$76.96

$17.39 discount

UndervaluedFair: $94.35Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

LIVE1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.3x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

QSR3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Return on EquityProfitability
33.1%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 33 in profit

EPS GrowthGrowth
151.2%10/10

Earnings expanding 151.2% YoY

Operating MarginProfitability
27.7%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 27.7%

Areas to Watch

LIVE4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Market CapQuality
$26.94M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
4.2%3/10

ROE of 4.2% — below average capital efficiency

Operating MarginProfitability
4.8%3/10

Operating margin of 4.8%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-3.2%2/10

Revenue declined 3.2%

QSR3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.6%4/10

4.6% revenue growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.902/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Debt/EquityHealth
4.071/10

Elevated debt levels

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : LIVE

The strongest argument for LIVE centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : QSR

The strongest argument for QSR centers on Return on Equity, EPS Growth, Operating Margin. PEG of 1.24 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : LIVE

The primary concerns for LIVE are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Operating Margin. Debt-to-equity of 2.44 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : QSR

The primary concerns for QSR are Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity. Debt-to-equity of 4.07 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

LIVE profiles as a turnaround stock while QSR is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

LIVE carries more volatility with a beta of 1.03 — expect wider price swings.

QSR is growing revenue faster at 4.6% — sustainability is the question.

QSR generates stronger free cash flow (479M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

QSR scores higher overall (68/100 vs 30/100). LIVE offers better value entry with a 85.9% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Live Ventures Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · HOME IMPROVEMENT RETAIL · USA

Live Ventures Incorporated is engaged in flooring manufacturing, steel fabrication and retail businesses in the United States. The company is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada.

Visit Website →

Restaurant Brands International Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESTAURANTS · USA

Restaurant Brands International Inc. owns, operates and franchises quick-service restaurants under the Tim Hortons (TH), Burger King (BK) and Popeyes (PLK) brands. The company is headquartered in Toronto, Canada.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?