WallStSmart

SemiLEDS Corporation (LEDS)vsSonos Inc (SONO)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Sonos Inc generates 5530% more annual revenue ($1.46B vs $25.93M). SONO leads profitability with a 1.6% profit margin vs -3.9%. SONO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 45/100 (D+).

LEDS

Avoid

35

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 7.3Profit: 3.5Value: 6.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: -14.37

SONO

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 4.0Value: 3.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.04
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

LEDSUndervalued (+76.4%)

Margin of Safety

+76.4%

Fair Value

$6.69

Current Price

$1.78

$4.91 discount

UndervaluedFair: $6.69Overvalued
SONOSignificantly Overvalued (-35.3%)

Margin of Safety

-35.3%

Fair Value

$12.20

Current Price

$14.43

$2.23 premium

UndervaluedFair: $12.20Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

LEDS1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
500.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 500.0% YoY

SONO2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
87.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 87.5% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.159/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

LEDS4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Market CapQuality
$16.22M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
-90.8%2/10

ROE of -90.8% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-48.6%2/10

Revenue declined 48.6%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
-14.372/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

SONO4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Market CapQuality
$1.81B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
6.2%3/10

ROE of 6.2% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
1.6%3/10

1.6% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : LEDS

The strongest argument for LEDS centers on EPS Growth.

Bull Case : SONO

The strongest argument for SONO centers on EPS Growth, Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : LEDS

The primary concerns for LEDS are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Revenue Growth.

Bear Case : SONO

The primary concerns for SONO are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 89.4x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 1.6% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

LEDS profiles as a turnaround stock while SONO is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

SONO carries more volatility with a beta of 1.96 — expect wider price swings.

SONO is growing revenue faster at 8.4% — sustainability is the question.

LEDS generates stronger free cash flow (2M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

SONO scores higher overall (45/100 vs 35/100). LEDS offers better value entry with a 76.4% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

SemiLEDS Corporation

TECHNOLOGY · SEMICONDUCTORS · USA

SemiLEDs Corporation develops, manufactures, and sells light-emitting diode (LED) chips, LED components, and LED modules and systems in the United States, Taiwan, the Netherlands, Germany, Japan, Ireland, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Chunan, Taiwan.

Sonos Inc

TECHNOLOGY · CONSUMER ELECTRONICS · USA

Sonos, Inc. designs, develops, manufactures, and sells multi-room audio products in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia Pacific. The company is headquartered in Santa Barbara, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?