WallStSmart

nLIGHT Inc (LASR)vsSonos Inc (SONO)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Sonos Inc generates 404% more annual revenue ($1.46B vs $289.84M). SONO leads profitability with a 1.6% profit margin vs -5.1%. SONO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 45/100 (D+).

LASR

Hold

36

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 6.0Profit: 2.0Value: 4.7Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.24

SONO

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 4.0Value: 3.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.04
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for LASR.

SONOSignificantly Overvalued (-34.6%)

Margin of Safety

-34.6%

Fair Value

$12.26

Current Price

$15.08

$2.82 premium

UndervaluedFair: $12.26Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

LASR2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
55.2%10/10

Revenue surging 55.2% year-over-year

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0810/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

SONO2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
87.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 87.5% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.159/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

LASR4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.784/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
8.7x4/10

Trading at 8.7x book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Return on EquityProfitability
-4.6%2/10

ROE of -4.6% — below average capital efficiency

SONO4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Market CapQuality
$1.83B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
6.2%3/10

ROE of 6.2% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
1.6%3/10

1.6% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : LASR

The strongest argument for LASR centers on Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 55.2% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : SONO

The strongest argument for SONO centers on EPS Growth, Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : LASR

The primary concerns for LASR are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : SONO

The primary concerns for SONO are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 90.3x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 1.6% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

LASR profiles as a hypergrowth stock while SONO is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

LASR carries more volatility with a beta of 2.29 — expect wider price swings.

LASR is growing revenue faster at 55.2% — sustainability is the question.

LASR generates stronger free cash flow (8M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

SONO scores higher overall (45/100 vs 36/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

nLIGHT Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SEMICONDUCTORS · USA

nLIGHT, Inc. designs, develops, manufactures and sells fiber and semiconductor lasers for industrial, microfabrication, aerospace and defense applications. The company is headquartered in Vancouver, Washington.

Sonos Inc

TECHNOLOGY · CONSUMER ELECTRONICS · USA

Sonos, Inc. designs, develops, manufactures, and sells multi-room audio products in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia Pacific. The company is headquartered in Santa Barbara, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?