WallStSmart

KULR Technology Group Inc (KULR)vsTE Connectivity Ltd (TEL)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

TE Connectivity Ltd generates 119943% more annual revenue ($19.32B vs $16.10M). TEL leads profitability with a 15.6% profit margin vs 0.0%. TEL earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 74/100 (B).

KULR

Avoid

24

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 5.3Profit: 2.5Value: 6.7Quality: 8.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 7.07

TEL

Strong Buy

74

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 6.0Profit: 8.0Value: 6.3Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.65
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

KULRUndervalued (+80.8%)

Margin of Safety

+80.8%

Fair Value

$14.81

Current Price

$2.38

$12.43 discount

UndervaluedFair: $14.81Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for TEL.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KULR2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
7.0710/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

TEL5 strengths · Avg: 8.4/10
Market CapQuality
$61.37B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
22.8%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 23 in profit

PEG RatioValuation
0.888/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Operating MarginProfitability
20.8%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 20.8%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.20B8/10

Generating 1.2B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

KULR4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$118.02M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
0.0%3/10

0.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

TEL1 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KULR

The strongest argument for KULR centers on Altman Z-Score, Price/Book.

Bull Case : TEL

The strongest argument for TEL centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, PEG Ratio. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.6% and operating margin at 20.8%. Revenue growth of 13.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : KULR

The primary concerns for KULR are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Profit Margin.

Bear Case : TEL

The primary concerns for TEL are Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

KULR profiles as a value stock while TEL is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

KULR carries more volatility with a beta of 2.32 — expect wider price swings.

TEL is growing revenue faster at 13.8% — sustainability is the question.

TEL generates stronger free cash flow (1.2B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

TEL scores higher overall (74/100 vs 24/100), backed by strong 15.6% margins and 13.8% revenue growth. KULR offers better value entry with a 80.8% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

KULR Technology Group Inc

TECHNOLOGY · ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS · USA

KULR Technology Group, Inc., through its subsidiary, KULR Technology Corporation, develops and markets thermal management technologies for batteries, electronics, and other component applications in the United States. The company is headquartered in Campbell, California.

TE Connectivity Ltd

TECHNOLOGY · ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS · USA

TE Connectivity is an American Swiss-domiciled technology company that designs and manufactures connectors and sensors for several industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, data communication systems, aerospace, defense, medical, oil and gas, consumer electronics and energy.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?