WallStSmart

Coca-Cola Femsa SAB de CV ADR (KOF)vsUniversal Corporation (UVV)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Coca-Cola Femsa SAB de CV ADR generates 9902% more annual revenue ($292.51B vs $2.92B). KOF leads profitability with a 7.9% profit margin vs 1.1%. UVV appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 4.13. KOF earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 48/100 (D+).

KOF

Hold

48

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 5.5Value: 5.7Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.49

UVV

Hold

44

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 3.3Profit: 4.5Value: 3.3Quality: 8.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 3.12
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

KOFUndervalued (+50.4%)

Margin of Safety

+50.4%

Fair Value

$227.20

Current Price

$107.04

$120.16 discount

UndervaluedFair: $227.20Overvalued
UVVFair Value (-1.4%)

Margin of Safety

-1.4%

Fair Value

$52.14

Current Price

$54.80

$2.66 premium

UndervaluedFair: $52.14Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KOF2 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.8x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$7.63B8/10

Generating 7.6B in free cash flow

UVV2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.0x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.1210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Areas to Watch

KOF4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.1%4/10

1.1% revenue growth

Profit MarginProfitability
7.9%3/10

7.9% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
22.252/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

UVV4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.8%4/10

1.8% revenue growth

Market CapQuality
$1.32B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
5.8%3/10

ROE of 5.8% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
1.1%3/10

1.1% margin — thin

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KOF

The strongest argument for KOF centers on Price/Book, Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : UVV

The strongest argument for UVV centers on Price/Book, Altman Z-Score.

Bear Case : KOF

The primary concerns for KOF are Revenue Growth, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : UVV

The primary concerns for UVV are Revenue Growth, Market Cap, Return on Equity. A P/E of 40.9x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 1.1% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

UVV carries more volatility with a beta of 0.57 — expect wider price swings.

UVV is growing revenue faster at 1.8% — sustainability is the question.

KOF generates stronger free cash flow (7.6B), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor BEVERAGES - NON-ALCOHOLIC industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

KOF scores higher overall (48/100 vs 44/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Coca-Cola Femsa SAB de CV ADR

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · BEVERAGES - NON-ALCOHOLIC · USA

Coca-Cola FEMSA, SAB de CV, a franchise bottler, produces, markets, sells and distributes Coca-Cola brand beverages. The company is headquartered in Mexico City, Mexico.

Visit Website →

Universal Corporation

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · TOBACCO · USA

Universal Corporation processes and supplies leaf tobacco and plant ingredients worldwide. The company is headquartered in Richmond, Virginia.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?