WallStSmart

Coca-Cola Femsa SAB de CV ADR (KOF)vsUnilever PLC ADR (UL)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Coca-Cola Femsa SAB de CV ADR generates 479% more annual revenue ($292.51B vs $50.50B). UL leads profitability with a 18.8% profit margin vs 7.9%. UL appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 10.73. KOF earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 50/100 (C-).

KOF

Buy

50

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.0Profit: 6.0Value: 5.7Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 2.49

UL

Hold

46

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.0Profit: 8.5Value: 4.3Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

KOFUndervalued (+79.7%)

Margin of Safety

+79.7%

Fair Value

$555.46

Current Price

$105.77

$449.69 discount

UndervaluedFair: $555.46Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for UL.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KOF2 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.8x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$7.63B8/10

Generating 7.6B in free cash flow

UL4 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
31.0%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 31 in profit

Market CapQuality
$130.20B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Operating MarginProfitability
20.1%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 20.1%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$5.48B8/10

Generating 5.5B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

KOF4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.1%4/10

1.1% revenue growth

Profit MarginProfitability
7.9%3/10

7.9% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
21.492/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

UL3 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
10.732/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-3.2%2/10

Revenue declined 3.2%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-3.4%2/10

Earnings declined 3.4%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KOF

The strongest argument for KOF centers on Price/Book, Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : UL

The strongest argument for UL centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 18.8% and operating margin at 20.1%.

Bear Case : KOF

The primary concerns for KOF are Revenue Growth, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : UL

The primary concerns for UL are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

KOF profiles as a value stock while UL is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

KOF carries more volatility with a beta of 0.53 — expect wider price swings.

KOF is growing revenue faster at 1.1% — sustainability is the question.

KOF generates stronger free cash flow (7.6B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

KOF scores higher overall (50/100 vs 46/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Coca-Cola Femsa SAB de CV ADR

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · BEVERAGES - NON-ALCOHOLIC · USA

Coca-Cola FEMSA, SAB de CV, a franchise bottler, produces, markets, sells and distributes Coca-Cola brand beverages. The company is headquartered in Mexico City, Mexico.

Visit Website →

Unilever PLC ADR

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS · USA

Unilever PLC is a fast moving consumer goods company in Asia, Africa, the Middle East, Turkey, Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, America and Europe. The company is headquartered in London, the United Kingdom.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?