WallStSmart

Coca-Cola Femsa SAB de CV ADR (KOF)vsThermo Fisher Scientific Inc (TMO)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Coca-Cola Femsa SAB de CV ADR generates 547% more annual revenue ($292.51B vs $45.20B). TMO leads profitability with a 15.1% profit margin vs 7.9%. TMO appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.56. TMO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 62/100 (C+).

KOF

Buy

50

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.0Profit: 6.0Value: 5.7Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 2.49

TMO

Buy

62

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 7.0Value: 4.0Quality: 5.3
Piotroski: 3/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

KOFUndervalued (+79.7%)

Margin of Safety

+79.7%

Fair Value

$555.46

Current Price

$105.77

$449.69 discount

UndervaluedFair: $555.46Overvalued
TMOSignificantly Overvalued (-16.1%)

Margin of Safety

-16.1%

Fair Value

$408.60

Current Price

$465.00

$56.40 premium

UndervaluedFair: $408.60Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KOF2 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$7.63B8/10

Generating 7.6B in free cash flow

TMO1 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Market CapQuality
$176.32B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Areas to Watch

KOF4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.6%4/10

1.6% revenue growth

Profit MarginProfitability
7.9%3/10

7.9% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
20.802/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

TMO3 concerns · Avg: 3.7/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.564/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
26.1x4/10

Moderate valuation

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KOF

The strongest argument for KOF centers on Price/Book, Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : TMO

The strongest argument for TMO centers on Market Cap. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.1% and operating margin at 17.9%.

Bear Case : KOF

The primary concerns for KOF are Revenue Growth, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : TMO

The primary concerns for TMO are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

KOF profiles as a value stock while TMO is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

TMO carries more volatility with a beta of 0.88 — expect wider price swings.

TMO is growing revenue faster at 6.2% — sustainability is the question.

KOF generates stronger free cash flow (7.6B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

TMO scores higher overall (62/100 vs 50/100), backed by strong 15.1% margins. KOF offers better value entry with a 79.7% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Coca-Cola Femsa SAB de CV ADR

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · BEVERAGES - NON-ALCOHOLIC · USA

Coca-Cola FEMSA, SAB de CV, a franchise bottler, produces, markets, sells and distributes Coca-Cola brand beverages. The company is headquartered in Mexico City, Mexico.

Visit Website →

Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

Thermo Fisher Scientific is an American provisioner of scientific instrumentation, reagents and consumables, and software and services to healthcare, life science, and other laboratories in academia, government, and industry (including in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical sectors). Based in Waltham, Massachusetts, Thermo Fisher was created in 2006 by the merger of Thermo Electron and Fisher Scientific, to form a company with US$ 9 billion in combined revenues.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?