WallStSmart

Coca-Cola Femsa SAB de CV ADR (KOF)vsRocky Mountain Chocolate Factory (RMCF)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Coca-Cola Femsa SAB de CV ADR generates 1073860% more annual revenue ($292.51B vs $27.24M). KOF leads profitability with a 7.9% profit margin vs -19.8%. KOF earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 48/100 (D+).

KOF

Hold

48

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 5.5Value: 5.7Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.49

RMCF

Avoid

27

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 2.0Value: 6.7Quality: 3.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.42
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

KOFUndervalued (+50.4%)

Margin of Safety

+50.4%

Fair Value

$227.20

Current Price

$107.04

$120.16 discount

UndervaluedFair: $227.20Overvalued
RMCFUndervalued (+49.1%)

Margin of Safety

+49.1%

Fair Value

$5.38

Current Price

$0.86

$4.52 discount

UndervaluedFair: $5.38Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KOF2 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.8x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$7.63B8/10

Generating 7.6B in free cash flow

RMCF1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

KOF4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.1%4/10

1.1% revenue growth

Profit MarginProfitability
7.9%3/10

7.9% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
22.252/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

RMCF4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Market CapQuality
$9.08M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Debt/EquityHealth
2.003/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-67.2%2/10

ROE of -67.2% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KOF

The strongest argument for KOF centers on Price/Book, Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : RMCF

The strongest argument for RMCF centers on Price/Book.

Bear Case : KOF

The primary concerns for KOF are Revenue Growth, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : RMCF

The primary concerns for RMCF are Market Cap, Debt/Equity, Piotroski F-Score. Debt-to-equity of 2.00 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

KOF profiles as a value stock while RMCF is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

RMCF carries more volatility with a beta of 0.70 — expect wider price swings.

KOF is growing revenue faster at 1.1% — sustainability is the question.

KOF generates stronger free cash flow (7.6B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

KOF scores higher overall (48/100 vs 27/100). RMCF offers better value entry with a 49.1% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Coca-Cola Femsa SAB de CV ADR

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · BEVERAGES - NON-ALCOHOLIC · USA

Coca-Cola FEMSA, SAB de CV, a franchise bottler, produces, markets, sells and distributes Coca-Cola brand beverages. The company is headquartered in Mexico City, Mexico.

Visit Website →

Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · CONFECTIONERS · USA

Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc., is a confectionery franchisor, manufacturer and retail operator. The company is headquartered in Durango, Colorado.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?