WallStSmart

Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB)vsWeis Markets Inc (WMK)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Kimberly-Clark Corporation generates 230% more annual revenue ($16.56B vs $5.01B). KMB leads profitability with a 12.8% profit margin vs 2.0%. WMK appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.38. WMK earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 58/100 (C).

KMB

Buy

58

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.7Profit: 8.0Value: 4.0Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.19

WMK

Buy

58

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 6.0Profit: 4.5Value: 5.3Quality: 8.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 5.14
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

KMBSignificantly Overvalued (-36.3%)

Margin of Safety

-36.3%

Fair Value

$78.97

Current Price

$99.04

$20.07 premium

UndervaluedFair: $78.97Overvalued
WMKOvervalued (-5.8%)

Margin of Safety

-5.8%

Fair Value

$66.97

Current Price

$78.22

$11.25 premium

UndervaluedFair: $66.97Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KMB1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
118.0%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 118 in profit

WMK4 strengths · Avg: 9.8/10
Price/BookValuation
1.4x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
54.9%10/10

Earnings expanding 54.9% YoY

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
5.1410/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Debt/EquityHealth
0.139/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

KMB4 concerns · Avg: 3.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.074/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
18.3x4/10

Trading at 18.3x book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.7%4/10

2.7% revenue growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

WMK4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.6%4/10

4.6% revenue growth

Return on EquityProfitability
7.4%3/10

ROE of 7.4% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
2.0%3/10

2.0% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
2.8%3/10

Operating margin of 2.8%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KMB

The strongest argument for KMB centers on Return on Equity.

Bull Case : WMK

The strongest argument for WMK centers on Price/Book, EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score. PEG of 1.38 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : KMB

The primary concerns for KMB are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, Revenue Growth. Debt-to-equity of 3.94 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : WMK

The primary concerns for WMK are Revenue Growth, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. Thin 2.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

WMK carries more volatility with a beta of 0.46 — expect wider price swings.

WMK is growing revenue faster at 4.6% — sustainability is the question.

KMB generates stronger free cash flow (321M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

KMB scores higher overall (58/100 vs 58/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Kimberly-Clark Corporation

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS · USA

Kimberly-Clark Corporation is an American multinational personal care corporation that produces mostly paper-based consumer products. The company manufactures sanitary paper products and surgical & medical instruments. Kimberly-Clark brand name products include Kleenex facial tissue, Kotex feminine hygiene products, Cottonelle, Scott and Andrex toilet paper, Wypall utility wipes, KimWipes scientific cleaning wipes and Huggies disposable diapers and baby wipes.

Visit Website →

Weis Markets Inc

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · GROCERY STORES · USA

Weis Markets, Inc. is a food retailer in Pennsylvania and the surrounding states. The company is headquartered in Sunbury, Pennsylvania.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?