WallStSmart

Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB)vsPepsiCo Inc (PEP)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

PepsiCo Inc generates 477% more annual revenue ($95.45B vs $16.56B). KMB leads profitability with a 12.8% profit margin vs 9.2%. PEP appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.52. PEP earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 62/100 (C+).

KMB

Buy

58

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.7Profit: 8.0Value: 4.0Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.19

PEP

Buy

62

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 8.0Value: 4.7Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.26
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

KMBSignificantly Overvalued (-36.3%)

Margin of Safety

-36.3%

Fair Value

$78.97

Current Price

$99.04

$20.07 premium

UndervaluedFair: $78.97Overvalued
PEPFair Value (-2.5%)

Margin of Safety

-2.5%

Fair Value

$138.40

Current Price

$141.92

$3.52 premium

UndervaluedFair: $138.40Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KMB1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
118.0%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 118 in profit

PEP3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
40.9%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 41 in profit

Market CapQuality
$194.11B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

EPS GrowthGrowth
27.8%8/10

Earnings expanding 27.8% YoY

Areas to Watch

KMB4 concerns · Avg: 3.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.074/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
18.3x4/10

Trading at 18.3x book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.7%4/10

2.7% revenue growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEP4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.524/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
9.1x4/10

Trading at 9.1x book value

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-406.00M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KMB

The strongest argument for KMB centers on Return on Equity.

Bull Case : PEP

The strongest argument for PEP centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : KMB

The primary concerns for KMB are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, Revenue Growth. Debt-to-equity of 3.94 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : PEP

The primary concerns for PEP are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, Piotroski F-Score. Debt-to-equity of 2.47 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

PEP carries more volatility with a beta of 0.39 — expect wider price swings.

PEP is growing revenue faster at 8.5% — sustainability is the question.

KMB generates stronger free cash flow (321M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

PEP scores higher overall (62/100 vs 58/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Kimberly-Clark Corporation

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS · USA

Kimberly-Clark Corporation is an American multinational personal care corporation that produces mostly paper-based consumer products. The company manufactures sanitary paper products and surgical & medical instruments. Kimberly-Clark brand name products include Kleenex facial tissue, Kotex feminine hygiene products, Cottonelle, Scott and Andrex toilet paper, Wypall utility wipes, KimWipes scientific cleaning wipes and Huggies disposable diapers and baby wipes.

Visit Website →

PepsiCo Inc

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · BEVERAGES - NON-ALCOHOLIC · USA

PepsiCo, Inc. is an American based multinational food, snack, and beverage corporation headquartered in Harrison, New York, in the hamlet of Purchase. PepsiCo's business encompasses all aspects of the food and beverage market. It oversees the manufacturing, distribution, and marketing of its products.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?