WallStSmart

Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM)vsEchoStar Corporation (SATS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

EchoStar Corporation generates 117% more annual revenue ($15.00B vs $6.90B). IRM leads profitability with a 2.1% profit margin vs -96.6%. SATS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.34. IRM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 52/100 (C-).

IRM

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 6.0Profit: 7.0Value: 2.7Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.12

SATS

Avoid

34

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 3.0Value: 7.0Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: -0.08
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

IRMOvervalued (-10.8%)

Margin of Safety

-10.8%

Fair Value

$90.41

Current Price

$114.52

$24.11 premium

UndervaluedFair: $90.41Overvalued
SATSUndervalued (+66.3%)

Margin of Safety

+66.3%

Fair Value

$326.45

Current Price

$123.14

$203.31 discount

UndervaluedFair: $326.45Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

IRM3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Return on EquityProfitability
225.1%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 225 in profit

Operating MarginProfitability
22.0%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 22.0%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
16.6%8/10

16.6% revenue growth

SATS0 strengths · Avg: 0/10

No standout strengths identified

Areas to Watch

IRM4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
2.1%3/10

2.1% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
2.702/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
229.0x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

SATS4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-111.3%2/10

ROE of -111.3% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-4.3%2/10

Revenue declined 4.3%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-85.6%2/10

Earnings declined 85.6%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : IRM

The strongest argument for IRM centers on Return on Equity, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 16.6% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : SATS

PEG of 1.34 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : IRM

The primary concerns for IRM are Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. A P/E of 229.0x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.1% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : SATS

The primary concerns for SATS are Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity, Revenue Growth. Debt-to-equity of 4.40 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

IRM profiles as a growth stock while SATS is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

IRM carries more volatility with a beta of 1.15 — expect wider price swings.

IRM is growing revenue faster at 16.6% — sustainability is the question.

IRM generates stronger free cash flow (-16M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

IRM scores higher overall (52/100 vs 34/100) and 16.6% revenue growth. SATS offers better value entry with a 66.3% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Iron Mountain Incorporated

REAL ESTATE · REIT - SPECIALTY · USA

Iron Mountain Inc. (NYSE: IRM) is an American enterprise information management services company founded in 1951 and headquartered in Boston, Massachusetts.

EchoStar Corporation

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · TELECOM SERVICES · USA

EchoStar Corporation provides broadband satellite technologies and broadband Internet services. The company is headquartered in Englewood, Colorado.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?