WallStSmart

Intrusion Inc (INTZ)vsPalo Alto Networks Inc (PANW)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Palo Alto Networks Inc generates 159267% more annual revenue ($9.89B vs $6.21M). PANW leads profitability with a 13.0% profit margin vs -169.5%. PANW earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 57/100 (C).

INTZ

Avoid

26

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 2.0Value: 6.7Quality: 4.8
Piotroski: 3/9

PANW

Buy

57

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 8.0Profit: 6.0Value: 4.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.02
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

INTZUndervalued (+47.5%)

Margin of Safety

+47.5%

Fair Value

$1.88

Current Price

$0.79

$1.09 discount

UndervaluedFair: $1.88Overvalued
PANWUndervalued (+39.7%)

Margin of Safety

+39.7%

Fair Value

$441.96

Current Price

$272.05

$169.91 discount

UndervaluedFair: $441.96Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

INTZ2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
125.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 125.0% YoY

Price/BookValuation
2.2x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

PANW3 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Market CapQuality
$241.01B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

EPS GrowthGrowth
60.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 60.5% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0710/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

INTZ4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$15.68M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-133.9%2/10

ROE of -133.9% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-50.0%2/10

Revenue declined 50.0%

PANW4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
3.0%3/10

ROE of 3.0% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
5.042/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
256.2x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : INTZ

The strongest argument for INTZ centers on EPS Growth, Price/Book.

Bull Case : PANW

The strongest argument for PANW centers on Market Cap, EPS Growth, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 14.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : INTZ

The primary concerns for INTZ are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : PANW

The primary concerns for PANW are Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. A P/E of 256.2x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

INTZ profiles as a turnaround stock while PANW is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

PANW carries more volatility with a beta of 0.77 — expect wider price swings.

PANW is growing revenue faster at 14.9% — sustainability is the question.

PANW generates stronger free cash flow (788M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

PANW scores higher overall (57/100 vs 26/100) and 14.9% revenue growth. INTZ offers better value entry with a 47.5% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Intrusion Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

Intrusion Inc. develops, markets, and supports entity identification, data mining, cybercrime, and advanced persistent threat detection products in the United States. The company is headquartered in Plano, Texas.

Palo Alto Networks Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. provides cybersecurity platform solutions globally. The company is headquartered in Santa Clara, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?