INNEOVA Holdings Limited (INEO)vsMagna International Inc (MGA)
INEO
INNEOVA Holdings Limited
$0.57
-3.22%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $9.09M
MGA
Magna International Inc
$66.09
-3.02%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $18.17B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Magna International Inc generates 72338% more annual revenue ($42.32B vs $58.42M). MGA leads profitability with a 1.6% profit margin vs -0.7%. MGA earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 55/100 (C-).
INEO
Avoid26
out of 100
Grade: F
MGA
Buy55
out of 100
Grade: C-
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Intrinsic value data unavailable for INEO.
Margin of Safety
+46.8%
Fair Value
$108.60
Current Price
$66.09
$42.51 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Every $100 of equity generates 22 in profit
Reasonable price relative to book value
Growing faster than its price suggests
Reasonable price relative to book value
Areas to Watch
Distress zone — elevated risk
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
Weak financial health signals
Revenue declined 20.6%
Moderate valuation
3.1% revenue growth
ROE of 5.6% — below average capital efficiency
1.6% margin — thin
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : INEO
The strongest argument for INEO centers on Return on Equity, Price/Book.
Bull Case : MGA
The strongest argument for MGA centers on PEG Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 0.39 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bear Case : INEO
The primary concerns for INEO are Altman Z-Score, Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score. Debt-to-equity of 3.99 is elevated, increasing financial risk.
Bear Case : MGA
The primary concerns for MGA are P/E Ratio, Revenue Growth, Return on Equity. Thin 1.6% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
INEO profiles as a turnaround stock while MGA is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.
MGA is growing revenue faster at 3.1% — sustainability is the question.
MGA generates stronger free cash flow (452M), providing more financial flexibility.
Monitor AUTO PARTS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.
Bottom Line
MGA scores higher overall (55/100 vs 26/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
INNEOVA Holdings Limited
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO PARTS · USA
INNEOVA Holdings Limited, distributes and sells automotive and industrial spare parts in Singapore, the Middle East, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.
Visit Website →Magna International Inc
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO PARTS · USA
Magna International Inc. designs, designs and manufactures components, assemblies, systems, subsystems and modules for vehicle and light truck original equipment manufacturers worldwide. The company is headquartered in Aurora, Canada.
Compare with Other AUTO PARTS Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?