WallStSmart

International Flavors & Fragrances Inc (IFF)vsSmith-Midland Corp (SMID)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

International Flavors & Fragrances Inc generates 11946% more annual revenue ($10.78B vs $89.50M). SMID leads profitability with a 8.6% profit margin vs 2.6%. SMID appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.20. SMID earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 45/100 (D).

IFF

Hold

44

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 2.7Profit: 4.5Value: 6.3Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 1.04

SMID

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 4.7Profit: 7.5Value: 5.3Quality: 9.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 3.90
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

IFFUndervalued (+63.6%)

Margin of Safety

+63.6%

Fair Value

$211.67

Current Price

$83.61

$128.06 discount

UndervaluedFair: $211.67Overvalued
SMIDSignificantly Overvalued (-60.0%)

Margin of Safety

-60.0%

Fair Value

$21.10

Current Price

$24.49

$3.39 premium

UndervaluedFair: $21.10Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

IFF1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

SMID5 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Debt/EquityHealth
0.0710/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.9010/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Return on EquityProfitability
26.0%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 26 in profit

P/E RatioValuation
17.8x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.3x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

IFF4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.944/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.8%4/10

1.8% revenue growth

Return on EquityProfitability
2.1%3/10

ROE of 2.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
2.6%3/10

2.6% margin — thin

SMID4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Market CapQuality
$138.08M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-10.8%2/10

Revenue declined 10.8%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-66.9%2/10

Earnings declined 66.9%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-2.41M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : IFF

The strongest argument for IFF centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : SMID

The strongest argument for SMID centers on Debt/Equity, Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity. PEG of 1.20 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : IFF

The primary concerns for IFF are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, Return on Equity. Thin 2.6% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : SMID

The primary concerns for SMID are Market Cap, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

SMID carries more volatility with a beta of 1.74 — expect wider price swings.

IFF is growing revenue faster at 1.8% — sustainability is the question.

IFF generates stronger free cash flow (284M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor SPECIALTY CHEMICALS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

SMID scores higher overall (45/100 vs 44/100). IFF offers better value entry with a 63.6% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

International Flavors & Fragrances Inc

BASIC MATERIALS · SPECIALTY CHEMICALS · USA

International Flavors & Fragrances is an American corporation that produces flavors, fragrances, and cosmetic actives, which it markets globally. It is headquartered in New York City.

Smith-Midland Corp

BASIC MATERIALS · BUILDING MATERIALS · USA

Smith-Midland Corporation invents, develops, manufactures, markets, leases, licenses, sells, and installs precast concrete products primarily for use in the construction, highway, utility, and agricultural industries. The company is headquartered in Midland, Virginia.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?