WallStSmart

Haverty Furniture Companies Inc (HVT)vsSteven Madden Ltd (SHOO)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Steven Madden Ltd generates 244% more annual revenue ($2.63B vs $766.48M). SHOO leads profitability with a 2.9% profit margin vs 2.6%. HVT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.09. SHOO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 59/100 (C).

HVT

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.0Profit: 4.0Value: 4.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.96

SHOO

Buy

59

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 8.0Profit: 6.5Value: 6.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 3.60
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

HVTSignificantly Overvalued (-58.0%)

Margin of Safety

-58.0%

Fair Value

$16.66

Current Price

$22.84

$6.18 premium

UndervaluedFair: $16.66Overvalued
SHOOUndervalued (+58.1%)

Margin of Safety

+58.1%

Fair Value

$92.18

Current Price

$44.03

$48.15 discount

UndervaluedFair: $92.18Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

HVT1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.2x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

SHOO3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
75.4%10/10

Earnings expanding 75.4% YoY

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.6010/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Revenue GrowthGrowth
18.0%8/10

18.0% revenue growth

Areas to Watch

HVT4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.1%4/10

4.1% revenue growth

Market CapQuality
$364.24M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
2.9%3/10

ROE of 2.9% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
2.6%3/10

2.6% margin — thin

SHOO4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.174/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Profit MarginProfitability
2.9%3/10

2.9% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

P/E RatioValuation
43.5x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : HVT

The strongest argument for HVT centers on Price/Book. PEG of 1.09 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : SHOO

The strongest argument for SHOO centers on EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 18.0% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : HVT

The primary concerns for HVT are Revenue Growth, Market Cap, Return on Equity. Thin 2.6% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : SHOO

The primary concerns for SHOO are PEG Ratio, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score. A P/E of 43.5x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.9% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

HVT profiles as a value stock while SHOO is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

HVT carries more volatility with a beta of 1.17 — expect wider price swings.

SHOO is growing revenue faster at 18.0% — sustainability is the question.

HVT generates stronger free cash flow (-10M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

SHOO scores higher overall (59/100 vs 56/100) and 18.0% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Haverty Furniture Companies Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · HOME IMPROVEMENT RETAIL · USA

Haverty Furniture Companies, Inc. is a specialty retailer of residential furniture and accessories in the United States. The company is headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia.

Steven Madden Ltd

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · FOOTWEAR & ACCESSORIES · USA

Steven Madden, Ltd. designs, supplies, markets and sells private label and brand name footwear for women, men and children in the United States and internationally. The company is headquartered in Long Island City, New York.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?