WallStSmart

H2O America (HTO)vsWoodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Woodside Energy Group Ltd generates 1491% more annual revenue ($12.98B vs $816.28M). WDS leads profitability with a 20.9% profit margin vs 12.9%. WDS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.33. HTO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 57/100 (C).

HTO

Buy

57

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 5.3Profit: 5.5Value: 6.0Quality: 5.0

WDS

Buy

53

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 2.0Profit: 6.0Value: 8.0Quality: 4.8
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.37
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

HTOUndervalued (+32.5%)

Margin of Safety

+32.5%

Fair Value

$76.99

Current Price

$57.60

$19.39 discount

UndervaluedFair: $76.99Overvalued
WDSUndervalued (+31.6%)

Margin of Safety

+31.6%

Fair Value

$27.42

Current Price

$22.42

$5.00 discount

UndervaluedFair: $27.42Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

HTO2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.4x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
21.5%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 21.5%

WDS3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.2x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Profit MarginProfitability
20.9%9/10

Keeps 21 of every $100 in revenue as profit

P/E RatioValuation
16.6x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Areas to Watch

HTO4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Return on EquityProfitability
6.5%3/10

ROE of 6.5% — below average capital efficiency

PEG RatioValuation
2.512/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-49.23M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

WDS4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
7.2%3/10

ROE of 7.2% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-11.1%2/10

Revenue declined 11.1%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-14.4%2/10

Earnings declined 14.4%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : HTO

The strongest argument for HTO centers on Price/Book, Operating Margin.

Bull Case : WDS

The strongest argument for WDS centers on Price/Book, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. Profitability is solid with margins at 20.9% and operating margin at 19.1%. PEG of 1.33 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : HTO

The primary concerns for HTO are EPS Growth, Return on Equity, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : WDS

The primary concerns for WDS are Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score, Revenue Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

HTO profiles as a value stock while WDS is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

HTO carries more volatility with a beta of 0.41 — expect wider price swings.

HTO is growing revenue faster at 9.4% — sustainability is the question.

WDS generates stronger free cash flow (417M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

HTO scores higher overall (57/100 vs 53/100). WDS offers better value entry with a 31.6% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

H2O America

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED WATER · USA

H2O America, provides water utility and other related services in the United States. The company is headquartered in San Jose, California.

Woodside Energy Group Ltd

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Woodside Energy Group Ltd is engaged in the exploration, evaluation, development, production, marketing and sale of hydrocarbons in Oceania, Asia, Canada, Africa and internationally. The company is headquartered in Perth, Australia.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?