WallStSmart

Global Water Resources Inc (GWRS)vsTransAlta Corp (TAC)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

TransAlta Corp generates 3809% more annual revenue ($2.21B vs $56.59M). GWRS leads profitability with a 3.5% profit margin vs -7.7%. GWRS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.89. GWRS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 34/100 (F).

GWRS

Avoid

34

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 4.0Value: 3.0Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 0.30

TAC

Avoid

33

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 4.0Value: 4.0Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: -0.19

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

GWRS1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.4x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

TAC0 strengths · Avg: 0/10

No standout strengths identified

Areas to Watch

GWRS4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Market CapQuality
$208.25M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
2.4%3/10

ROE of 2.4% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
3.5%3/10

3.5% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
2.9%3/10

Operating margin of 2.9%

TAC4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Price/BookValuation
11.3x4/10

Trading at 11.3x book value

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
6.982/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-12.1%2/10

ROE of -12.1% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : GWRS

The strongest argument for GWRS centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : TAC

TAC has a balanced fundamental profile.

Bear Case : GWRS

The primary concerns for GWRS are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 90.5x leaves little room for execution misses. Debt-to-equity of 1.65 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : TAC

The primary concerns for TAC are Price/Book, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. Debt-to-equity of 3.17 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

GWRS profiles as a value stock while TAC is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

GWRS carries more volatility with a beta of 0.92 — expect wider price swings.

GWRS is growing revenue faster at 6.7% — sustainability is the question.

TAC generates stronger free cash flow (93M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

GWRS scores higher overall (34/100 vs 33/100). Both earn "Avoid" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Global Water Resources Inc

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED WATER · USA

Global Water Resources, Inc., a water resources management company, owns, operates and manages regulated water, wastewater and recycled water services primarily in the Phoenix, Arizona metropolitan area. The company is headquartered in Phoenix, Arizona.

TransAlta Corp

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

TransAlta Corporation owns, operates and develops a diverse fleet of electric power generation assets in Canada, the United States and Australia. The company is headquartered in Calgary, Canada.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?