WallStSmart

Glatfelter (GLT)vsSuzano Papel e Celulose SA ADR (SUZ)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Suzano Papel e Celulose SA ADR generates 3683% more annual revenue ($49.53B vs $1.31B). SUZ leads profitability with a 23.0% profit margin vs -5.1%. SUZ earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 57/100 (C).

GLT

Hold

41

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 6.0Profit: 3.0Value: 4.7Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.62

SUZ

Buy

57

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 2.0Profit: 7.5Value: 8.3Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 1.11
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for GLT.

SUZUndervalued (+50.8%)

Margin of Safety

+50.8%

Fair Value

$22.71

Current Price

$8.18

$14.53 discount

UndervaluedFair: $22.71Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

GLT1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.4x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

SUZ4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
P/E RatioValuation
4.6x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.1x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Return on EquityProfitability
23.7%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

Profit MarginProfitability
23.0%9/10

Keeps 23 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Areas to Watch

GLT4 concerns · Avg: 3.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.804/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.7%4/10

0.7% revenue growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.624/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Market CapQuality
$73.67M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

SUZ4 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
-5.1%2/10

Revenue declined 5.1%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-31.9%2/10

Earnings declined 31.9%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-101.68M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.112/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : GLT

The strongest argument for GLT centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : SUZ

The strongest argument for SUZ centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Return on Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 23.0% and operating margin at 16.7%.

Bear Case : GLT

The primary concerns for GLT are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score. Debt-to-equity of 4.29 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : SUZ

The primary concerns for SUZ are Revenue Growth, EPS Growth, Free Cash Flow. Debt-to-equity of 2.03 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

GLT profiles as a turnaround stock while SUZ is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

GLT carries more volatility with a beta of 1.74 — expect wider price swings.

GLT is growing revenue faster at 0.7% — sustainability is the question.

GLT generates stronger free cash flow (-1M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

SUZ scores higher overall (57/100 vs 41/100), backed by strong 23.0% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Glatfelter

BASIC MATERIALS · PAPER & PAPER PRODUCTS · USA

Glatfelter Corporation manufactures and sells engineering materials worldwide. The company is headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina.

Suzano Papel e Celulose SA ADR

BASIC MATERIALS · PAPER & PAPER PRODUCTS · USA

Suzano SA produces and sells eucalyptus pulp and paper products in Brazil and internationally. The company is headquartered in Salvador, Brazil.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?