WallStSmart

Gildan Activewear Inc. (GIL)vsPVH Corp (PVH)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

PVH Corp generates 121% more annual revenue ($8.99B vs $4.07B). GIL leads profitability with a 6.1% profit margin vs 1.8%. PVH appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.06. GIL earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 60/100 (C).

GIL

Buy

60

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 5.3Profit: 5.0Value: 4.7Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.29

PVH

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 2.7Profit: 5.0Value: 7.0Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.10
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

GILSignificantly Overvalued (-45.9%)

Margin of Safety

-45.9%

Fair Value

$49.65

Current Price

$52.75

$3.10 premium

UndervaluedFair: $49.65Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for PVH.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

GIL3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
63.8%10/10

Revenue surging 63.8% year-over-year

PEG RatioValuation
0.538/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
2.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

PVH2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.0610/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
0.7x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

GIL4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
35.5x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Return on EquityProfitability
7.3%3/10

ROE of 7.3% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
6.1%3/10

6.1% margin — thin

Debt/EquityHealth
1.473/10

Elevated debt levels

PVH4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.1%4/10

2.1% revenue growth

Return on EquityProfitability
0.5%3/10

ROE of 0.5% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
1.8%3/10

1.8% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : GIL

The strongest argument for GIL centers on Revenue Growth, PEG Ratio, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 63.8% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.53 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : PVH

The strongest argument for PVH centers on PEG Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 0.06 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : GIL

The primary concerns for GIL are P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Profit Margin.

Bear Case : PVH

The primary concerns for PVH are Revenue Growth, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. Thin 1.8% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

GIL profiles as a hypergrowth stock while PVH is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

PVH carries more volatility with a beta of 1.72 — expect wider price swings.

GIL is growing revenue faster at 63.8% — sustainability is the question.

PVH generates stronger free cash flow (-86M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

GIL scores higher overall (60/100 vs 55/100) and 63.8% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Gildan Activewear Inc.

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · APPAREL MANUFACTURING · USA

Gildan Activewear Inc. manufactures and sells various apparel products in the United States, Canada, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Montreal, Canada.

Visit Website →

PVH Corp

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · APPAREL MANUFACTURING · USA

PVH Corp., formerly known as the Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation, is an American clothing company which owns brands such as Van Heusen, Tommy Hilfiger, Calvin Klein, IZOD, Arrow, Warner's, Olga, True & Co., and Geoffrey Beene.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?