WallStSmart

Gildan Activewear Inc. (GIL)vsPVH Corp (PVH)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

PVH Corp generates 88% more annual revenue ($8.92B vs $4.74B). GIL leads profitability with a 1.3% profit margin vs -1.9%. PVH appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.06. GIL earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 63/100 (C+).

GIL

Buy

63

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 6.0Value: 5.3Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.29

PVH

Hold

50

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.0Profit: 4.5Value: 6.7Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.10
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

GILSignificantly Overvalued (-26.5%)

Margin of Safety

-26.5%

Fair Value

$57.25

Current Price

$47.01

$10.24 premium

UndervaluedFair: $57.25Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for PVH.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

GIL4 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.3910/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Revenue GrowthGrowth
72.3%10/10

Revenue surging 72.3% year-over-year

Price/BookValuation
2.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
22.3%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 22.3%

PVH2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.0610/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
0.7x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

GIL4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
35.8x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Return on EquityProfitability
7.3%3/10

ROE of 7.3% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
1.3%3/10

1.3% margin — thin

Debt/EquityHealth
1.453/10

Elevated debt levels

PVH4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
0.5%3/10

ROE of 0.5% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-3.2%2/10

Revenue declined 3.2%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-96.2%2/10

Earnings declined 96.2%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : GIL

The strongest argument for GIL centers on PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 72.3% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.39 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : PVH

The strongest argument for PVH centers on PEG Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 0.06 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : GIL

The primary concerns for GIL are P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. Thin 1.3% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : PVH

The primary concerns for PVH are Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score, Revenue Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

GIL profiles as a hypergrowth stock while PVH is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

PVH carries more volatility with a beta of 1.72 — expect wider price swings.

GIL is growing revenue faster at 72.3% — sustainability is the question.

PVH generates stronger free cash flow (346M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

GIL scores higher overall (63/100 vs 50/100) and 72.3% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Gildan Activewear Inc.

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · APPAREL MANUFACTURING · USA

Gildan Activewear Inc. manufactures and sells various apparel products in the United States, Canada, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Montreal, Canada.

Visit Website →

PVH Corp

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · APPAREL MANUFACTURING · USA

PVH Corp., formerly known as the Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation, is an American clothing company which owns brands such as Van Heusen, Tommy Hilfiger, Calvin Klein, IZOD, Arrow, Warner's, Olga, True & Co., and Geoffrey Beene.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?