WallStSmart

Guardant Health Inc (GH)vsWaters Corporation (WAT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Waters Corporation generates 222% more annual revenue ($3.17B vs $982.02M). WAT leads profitability with a 20.3% profit margin vs -42.4%. WAT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 60/100 (C).

GH

Avoid

31

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 8.0Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: -2.02

WAT

Buy

60

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.0Profit: 9.0Value: 7.3Quality: 6.8
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 4.92
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for GH.

WATSignificantly Overvalued (-349.9%)

Margin of Safety

-349.9%

Fair Value

$73.17

Current Price

$302.32

$229.15 premium

UndervaluedFair: $73.17Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

GH2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
39.4%10/10

Revenue surging 39.4% year-over-year

Debt/EquityHealth
-3.7410/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

WAT4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
33.8%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 33.8%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.9210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Return on EquityProfitability
29.3%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 29 in profit

Profit MarginProfitability
20.3%9/10

Keeps 20 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Areas to Watch

GH4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-45.8%2/10

ROE of -45.8% — below average capital efficiency

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-41.93M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

WAT2 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
28.1x4/10

Moderate valuation

EPS GrowthGrowth
-3.1%2/10

Earnings declined 3.1%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : GH

The strongest argument for GH centers on Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 39.4% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : WAT

The strongest argument for WAT centers on Operating Margin, Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 20.3% and operating margin at 33.8%. PEG of 1.25 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : GH

The primary concerns for GH are EPS Growth, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : WAT

The primary concerns for WAT are P/E Ratio, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

GH profiles as a hypergrowth stock while WAT is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

GH carries more volatility with a beta of 1.69 — expect wider price swings.

GH is growing revenue faster at 39.4% — sustainability is the question.

WAT generates stronger free cash flow (126M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

WAT scores higher overall (60/100 vs 31/100), backed by strong 20.3% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Guardant Health Inc

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

Guardant Health, Inc., a precision oncology company, offers blood testing, data sets, and testing in the United States and internationally. The company is headquartered in Redwood City, California.

Visit Website →

Waters Corporation

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

Waters Corporation is a publicly traded Analytical Laboratory instrument and software company headquartered in Milford, Massachusetts.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?