WallStSmart

H B Fuller Company (FUL)vsSociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA ADR B (SQM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA ADR B generates 53% more annual revenue ($5.30B vs $3.46B). SQM leads profitability with a 15.4% profit margin vs 4.6%. SQM appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.34. SQM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 74/100 (B).

FUL

Buy

54

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 5.5Value: 4.0Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.94

SQM

Strong Buy

74

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 7.3Profit: 7.5Value: 7.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.04
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FULSignificantly Overvalued (-18.3%)

Margin of Safety

-18.3%

Fair Value

$56.55

Current Price

$59.88

$3.33 premium

UndervaluedFair: $56.55Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for SQM.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FUL2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
58.3%10/10

Earnings expanding 58.3% YoY

Price/BookValuation
1.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

SQM4 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.3410/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Operating MarginProfitability
41.1%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 41.1%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
69.8%10/10

Revenue surging 69.8% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
165.2%10/10

Earnings expanding 165.2% YoY

Areas to Watch

FUL4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.204/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.944/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Profit MarginProfitability
4.6%3/10

4.6% margin — thin

Debt/EquityHealth
1.013/10

Elevated debt levels

SQM1 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
26.4x4/10

Moderate valuation

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FUL

The strongest argument for FUL centers on EPS Growth, Price/Book.

Bull Case : SQM

The strongest argument for SQM centers on PEG Ratio, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.4% and operating margin at 41.1%. Revenue growth of 69.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FUL

The primary concerns for FUL are PEG Ratio, Altman Z-Score, Profit Margin. Thin 4.6% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : SQM

The primary concerns for SQM are P/E Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FUL profiles as a value stock while SQM is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

SQM carries more volatility with a beta of 0.97 — expect wider price swings.

SQM is growing revenue faster at 69.8% — sustainability is the question.

SQM generates stronger free cash flow (679M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

SQM scores higher overall (74/100 vs 54/100), backed by strong 15.4% margins and 69.8% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

H B Fuller Company

BASIC MATERIALS · SPECIALTY CHEMICALS · USA

HB Fuller Company formulates, manufactures and markets adhesives, sealants, coatings, polymers, tapes, encapsulants, additives and other specialty chemicals worldwide. The company is headquartered in Saint Paul, Minnesota.

Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA ADR B

BASIC MATERIALS · SPECIALTY CHEMICALS · USA

Sociedad Qumica y Minera de Chile SA produces and distributes specialty plant nutrients, iodine and its derivatives, lithium and its derivatives, potassium chloride and sulfate, industrial chemicals and other products and services worldwide. The company is headquartered in Santiago, Chile.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?