WallStSmart

H B Fuller Company (FUL)vsSociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA ADR B (SQM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA ADR B generates 32% more annual revenue ($4.58B vs $3.47B). SQM leads profitability with a 12.9% profit margin vs 4.4%. SQM appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.46. SQM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 66/100 (B-).

FUL

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.0Profit: 5.0Value: 10.0Quality: 5.0

SQM

Strong Buy

66

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 6.7Profit: 7.0Value: 9.3Quality: 7.3
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.01
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FULUndervalued (+47.1%)

Margin of Safety

+47.1%

Fair Value

$126.50

Current Price

$56.71

$69.79 discount

UndervaluedFair: $126.50Overvalued
SQMUndervalued (+22.0%)

Margin of Safety

+22.0%

Fair Value

$96.41

Current Price

$79.16

$17.25 discount

UndervaluedFair: $96.41Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FUL2 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
24.5%8/10

Earnings expanding 24.5% YoY

SQM4 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.4610/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

EPS GrowthGrowth
52.3%10/10

Earnings expanding 52.3% YoY

Operating MarginProfitability
28.3%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 28.3%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
23.3%8/10

Revenue surging 23.3% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

FUL4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.204/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
7.9%3/10

ROE of 7.9% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
4.4%3/10

4.4% margin — thin

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-3.1%2/10

Revenue declined 3.1%

SQM1 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
37.4x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FUL

The strongest argument for FUL centers on Price/Book, EPS Growth.

Bull Case : SQM

The strongest argument for SQM centers on PEG Ratio, EPS Growth, Operating Margin. Revenue growth of 23.3% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.46 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : FUL

The primary concerns for FUL are PEG Ratio, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. Thin 4.4% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : SQM

The primary concerns for SQM are P/E Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FUL profiles as a value stock while SQM is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

FUL carries more volatility with a beta of 1.04 — expect wider price swings.

SQM is growing revenue faster at 23.3% — sustainability is the question.

SQM generates stronger free cash flow (317M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

SQM scores higher overall (66/100 vs 56/100) and 23.3% revenue growth. FUL offers better value entry with a 47.1% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

H B Fuller Company

BASIC MATERIALS · SPECIALTY CHEMICALS · USA

HB Fuller Company formulates, manufactures and markets adhesives, sealants, coatings, polymers, tapes, encapsulants, additives and other specialty chemicals worldwide. The company is headquartered in Saint Paul, Minnesota.

Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA ADR B

BASIC MATERIALS · SPECIALTY CHEMICALS · USA

Sociedad Qumica y Minera de Chile SA produces and distributes specialty plant nutrients, iodine and its derivatives, lithium and its derivatives, potassium chloride and sulfate, industrial chemicals and other products and services worldwide. The company is headquartered in Santiago, Chile.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?