WallStSmart

Fortive Corp (FTV)vsSensata Technologies Holding NV (ST)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Fortive Corp generates 12% more annual revenue ($4.16B vs $3.70B). FTV leads profitability with a 13.9% profit margin vs 0.9%. ST appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.23. ST earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

FTV

Buy

54

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 2.7Profit: 6.0Value: 7.3Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.00

ST

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 5.5Value: 4.7Quality: 6.8
Piotroski: 3/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FTVSignificantly Overvalued (-443.1%)

Margin of Safety

-443.1%

Fair Value

$10.81

Current Price

$54.78

$43.97 premium

UndervaluedFair: $10.81Overvalued
STSignificantly Overvalued (-278.6%)

Margin of Safety

-278.6%

Fair Value

$9.83

Current Price

$36.40

$26.57 premium

UndervaluedFair: $9.83Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FTV2 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.7x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
20.1%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 20.1%

ST3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.2310/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0110/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Price/BookValuation
1.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

FTV4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
34.5x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.6%4/10

4.6% revenue growth

Return on EquityProfitability
6.4%3/10

ROE of 6.4% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-2.6%2/10

Earnings declined 2.6%

ST4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.1%4/10

1.1% revenue growth

Return on EquityProfitability
1.1%3/10

ROE of 1.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
0.9%3/10

0.9% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FTV

The strongest argument for FTV centers on Price/Book, Operating Margin. PEG of 1.29 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : ST

The strongest argument for ST centers on PEG Ratio, Debt/Equity, Price/Book. PEG of 0.23 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : FTV

The primary concerns for FTV are P/E Ratio, Revenue Growth, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : ST

The primary concerns for ST are Revenue Growth, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 173.3x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 0.9% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ST carries more volatility with a beta of 1.14 — expect wider price swings.

FTV is growing revenue faster at 4.6% — sustainability is the question.

FTV generates stronger free cash flow (336M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor SCIENTIFIC & TECHNICAL INSTRUMENTS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

ST scores higher overall (64/100 vs 54/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Fortive Corp

TECHNOLOGY · SCIENTIFIC & TECHNICAL INSTRUMENTS · USA

Fortive is an American diversified industrial technology conglomerate company headquartered in Everett, Washington.

Visit Website →

Sensata Technologies Holding NV

TECHNOLOGY · SCIENTIFIC & TECHNICAL INSTRUMENTS · USA

Sensata Technologies Holding plc, develops, manufactures and sells sensors, sensor-based solutions, controls and other products in America, Europe, Asia and internationally. The company is headquartered in Attleboro, Massachusetts.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?