WallStSmart

Fortive Corp (FTV)vsPalo Alto Networks Inc (PANW)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Palo Alto Networks Inc generates 138% more annual revenue ($9.89B vs $4.16B). FTV leads profitability with a 13.9% profit margin vs 13.0%. FTV appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.29. PANW earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 56/100 (C).

FTV

Buy

54

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 2.7Profit: 6.0Value: 5.3Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.00

PANW

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 8.0Profit: 7.0Value: 4.7Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.02
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FTVUndervalued (+6.1%)

Margin of Safety

+6.1%

Fair Value

$62.55

Current Price

$59.79

$2.76 discount

UndervaluedFair: $62.55Overvalued
PANWUndervalued (+60.8%)

Margin of Safety

+60.8%

Fair Value

$457.02

Current Price

$179.32

$277.70 discount

UndervaluedFair: $457.02Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FTV2 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
20.1%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 20.1%

PANW3 strengths · Avg: 9.7/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
60.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 60.5% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0410/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Market CapQuality
$145.43B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Areas to Watch

FTV4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
38.8x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.6%4/10

4.6% revenue growth

Return on EquityProfitability
6.4%3/10

ROE of 6.4% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-2.6%2/10

Earnings declined 2.6%

PANW4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Price/BookValuation
13.4x4/10

Trading at 13.4x book value

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
3.052/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
100.2x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FTV

The strongest argument for FTV centers on Price/Book, Operating Margin. PEG of 1.29 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : PANW

The strongest argument for PANW centers on EPS Growth, Debt/Equity, Market Cap. Revenue growth of 14.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FTV

The primary concerns for FTV are P/E Ratio, Revenue Growth, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : PANW

The primary concerns for PANW are Price/Book, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. A P/E of 100.2x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FTV carries more volatility with a beta of 1.00 — expect wider price swings.

PANW is growing revenue faster at 14.9% — sustainability is the question.

PANW generates stronger free cash flow (470M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor SCIENTIFIC & TECHNICAL INSTRUMENTS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

PANW scores higher overall (56/100 vs 54/100) and 14.9% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Fortive Corp

TECHNOLOGY · SCIENTIFIC & TECHNICAL INSTRUMENTS · USA

Fortive is an American diversified industrial technology conglomerate company headquartered in Everett, Washington.

Visit Website →

Palo Alto Networks Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. provides cybersecurity platform solutions globally. The company is headquartered in Santa Clara, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?