TechnipFMC PLC (FTI)vsRPC Inc (RES)
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
TechnipFMC PLC generates 483% more annual revenue ($10.19B vs $1.75B). FTI leads profitability with a 10.6% profit margin vs 1.2%. FTI appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.59. FTI earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).
FTI
Buy64
out of 100
Grade: C+
RES
Hold47
out of 100
Grade: D+
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
-81.9%
Fair Value
$38.92
Current Price
$69.02
$30.10 premium
Margin of Safety
+74.8%
Fair Value
$22.75
Current Price
$6.81
$15.94 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Every $100 of equity generates 32 in profit
Earnings expanding 93.9% YoY
Reasonable price relative to book value
Revenue surging 36.6% year-over-year
Conservative balance sheet, low leverage
Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk
Areas to Watch
Moderate valuation
Trading at 8.2x book value
Expensive relative to growth rate
Distress zone — elevated risk
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
ROE of 1.9% — below average capital efficiency
1.2% margin — thin
Operating margin of 1.8%
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : FTI
The strongest argument for FTI centers on Return on Equity, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 11.6% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bull Case : RES
The strongest argument for RES centers on Price/Book, Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 36.6% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bear Case : FTI
The primary concerns for FTI are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, PEG Ratio.
Bear Case : RES
The primary concerns for RES are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 73.6x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 1.2% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
FTI profiles as a value stock while RES is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.
RES carries more volatility with a beta of 0.69 — expect wider price swings.
RES is growing revenue faster at 36.6% — sustainability is the question.
FTI generates stronger free cash flow (277M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
FTI scores higher overall (64/100 vs 47/100) and 11.6% revenue growth. RES offers better value entry with a 74.8% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
TechnipFMC PLC
ENERGY · OIL & GAS EQUIPMENT & SERVICES · USA
TechnipFMC plc is involved in oil and gas projects, technologies, systems and services. The company is headquartered in London, the United Kingdom.
RPC Inc
ENERGY · OIL & GAS EQUIPMENT & SERVICES · USA
RPC, Inc. provides a range of oilfield services and equipment for oil and gas companies involved in the exploration, production and development of oil and gas properties. The company is headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia.
Compare with Other OIL & GAS EQUIPMENT & SERVICES Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?