WallStSmart

TechnipFMC PLC (FTI)vsKodiak Gas Services, Inc. (KGS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

TechnipFMC PLC generates 670% more annual revenue ($10.19B vs $1.32B). FTI leads profitability with a 10.6% profit margin vs 5.1%. FTI trades at a lower P/E of 27.1x. FTI earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

FTI

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 8.0Profit: 7.5Value: 3.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 1.18

KGS

Hold

39

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 5.3Profit: 6.0Value: 4.0Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 0.84
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FTISignificantly Overvalued (-81.9%)

Margin of Safety

-81.9%

Fair Value

$38.92

Current Price

$69.02

$30.10 premium

UndervaluedFair: $38.92Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for KGS.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FTI2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
32.2%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 32 in profit

EPS GrowthGrowth
93.9%10/10

Earnings expanding 93.9% YoY

KGS2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Operating MarginProfitability
33.7%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 33.7%

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0410/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

FTI4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
27.1x4/10

Moderate valuation

Price/BookValuation
8.2x4/10

Trading at 8.2x book value

PEG RatioValuation
2.592/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.182/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

KGS4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.9%4/10

4.9% revenue growth

Return on EquityProfitability
5.4%3/10

ROE of 5.4% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
5.1%3/10

5.1% margin — thin

P/E RatioValuation
90.9x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FTI

The strongest argument for FTI centers on Return on Equity, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 11.6% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : KGS

The strongest argument for KGS centers on Operating Margin, Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : FTI

The primary concerns for FTI are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : KGS

The primary concerns for KGS are Revenue Growth, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 90.9x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

KGS carries more volatility with a beta of 0.88 — expect wider price swings.

FTI is growing revenue faster at 11.6% — sustainability is the question.

FTI generates stronger free cash flow (277M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor OIL & GAS EQUIPMENT & SERVICES industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

FTI scores higher overall (64/100 vs 39/100) and 11.6% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

TechnipFMC PLC

ENERGY · OIL & GAS EQUIPMENT & SERVICES · USA

TechnipFMC plc is involved in oil and gas projects, technologies, systems and services. The company is headquartered in London, the United Kingdom.

Kodiak Gas Services, Inc.

ENERGY · OIL & GAS EQUIPMENT & SERVICES · USA

Kodiak Gas Services, LLC provides contract compression infrastructure services for the oil and gas industry in the United States. The company is headquartered in Montgomery, Texas.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?