WallStSmart

Federal Signal Corporation (FSS)vsVertiv Holdings Co (VRT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Vertiv Holdings Co generates 369% more annual revenue ($11.48B vs $2.45B). VRT leads profitability with a 15.1% profit margin vs 11.7%. VRT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.14. VRT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 71/100 (B).

FSS

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 8.0Profit: 7.5Value: 5.0Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 3.26

VRT

Strong Buy

71

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 9.3Profit: 8.5Value: 4.3Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.97

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FSS3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.2610/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Revenue GrowthGrowth
18.7%8/10

18.7% revenue growth

EPS GrowthGrowth
20.7%8/10

Earnings expanding 20.7% YoY

VRT5 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
36.7%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 37 in profit

EPS GrowthGrowth
53.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 53.0% YoY

Market CapQuality
$103.92B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Operating MarginProfitability
20.4%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 20.4%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
24.1%8/10

Revenue surging 24.1% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

FSS3 concerns · Avg: 3.7/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.924/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
26.9x4/10

Moderate valuation

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

VRT4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.974/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

P/E RatioValuation
59.6x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
25.2x2/10

Trading at 25.2x book value

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FSS

The strongest argument for FSS centers on Altman Z-Score, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 18.7% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : VRT

The strongest argument for VRT centers on Return on Equity, EPS Growth, Market Cap. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.1% and operating margin at 20.4%. Revenue growth of 24.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FSS

The primary concerns for FSS are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : VRT

The primary concerns for VRT are Altman Z-Score, Piotroski F-Score, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 59.6x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

VRT carries more volatility with a beta of 2.08 — expect wider price swings.

VRT is growing revenue faster at 24.1% — sustainability is the question.

VRT generates stronger free cash flow (654M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor FARM & HEAVY CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

VRT scores higher overall (71/100 vs 64/100), backed by strong 15.1% margins and 24.1% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Federal Signal Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · FARM & HEAVY CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY · USA

Federal Signal Corporation designs, manufactures, and supplies a suite of integrated products and solutions for municipal, government, industrial, and commercial customers in the United States, Canada, Europe, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Oak Brook, Illinois.

Visit Website →

Vertiv Holdings Co

INDUSTRIALS · ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT & PARTS · USA

Vertiv Holdings Co designs, manufactures and services critical digital infrastructure technologies and lifecycle services for data centers, communication networks, and commercial and industrial environments in the Americas, Asia Pacific, Europe, the Middle East, and Africa. The company is headquartered in Columbus, Ohio.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?