WallStSmart

Formula Systems 1985 Ltd ADR (FORTY)vsSonos Inc (SONO)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Formula Systems 1985 Ltd ADR generates 96% more annual revenue ($2.93B vs $1.49B). FORTY leads profitability with a 21.6% profit margin vs 3.8%. FORTY trades at a lower P/E of 27.4x. FORTY earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 61/100 (C+).

FORTY

Buy

61

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 6.7Profit: 7.5Value: 3.3Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.22

SONO

Hold

48

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 4.5Value: 3.7Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.04
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FORTYSignificantly Overvalued (-67.1%)

Margin of Safety

-67.1%

Fair Value

$79.89

Current Price

$119.20

$39.31 premium

UndervaluedFair: $79.89Overvalued
SONOSignificantly Overvalued (-32.1%)

Margin of Safety

-32.1%

Fair Value

$12.49

Current Price

$15.53

$3.04 premium

UndervaluedFair: $12.49Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FORTY4 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Return on EquityProfitability
44.8%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 45 in profit

EPS GrowthGrowth
54.7%10/10

Earnings expanding 54.7% YoY

Profit MarginProfitability
21.6%9/10

Keeps 22 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

SONO2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
87.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 87.5% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.129/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

FORTY4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
27.4x4/10

Moderate valuation

Market CapQuality
$1.98B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
4.072/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

SONO4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
32.3x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Market CapQuality
$1.72B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
6.2%3/10

ROE of 6.2% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
3.8%3/10

3.8% margin — thin

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FORTY

The strongest argument for FORTY centers on Return on Equity, EPS Growth, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 21.6% and operating margin at 9.2%.

Bull Case : SONO

The strongest argument for SONO centers on EPS Growth, Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : FORTY

The primary concerns for FORTY are P/E Ratio, Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : SONO

The primary concerns for SONO are P/E Ratio, Market Cap, Return on Equity. Thin 3.8% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FORTY profiles as a mature stock while SONO is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

SONO carries more volatility with a beta of 1.94 — expect wider price swings.

SONO is growing revenue faster at 8.8% — sustainability is the question.

Monitor INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

FORTY scores higher overall (61/100 vs 48/100), backed by strong 21.6% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Formula Systems 1985 Ltd ADR

TECHNOLOGY · INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES · USA

Formula Systems (1985) Ltd., provides software, proprietary and non-proprietary software, and software product marketing and support services in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Or Yehuda, Israel.

Visit Website →

Sonos Inc

TECHNOLOGY · CONSUMER ELECTRONICS · USA

Sonos, Inc. designs, develops, manufactures, and sells multi-room audio products in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia Pacific. The company is headquartered in Santa Barbara, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?