WallStSmart

Fonar Corporation (FONR)vsNatera Inc (NTRA)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Natera Inc generates 2274% more annual revenue ($2.50B vs $105.34M). FONR leads profitability with a 6.3% profit margin vs -9.1%. FONR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 38/100 (F).

FONR

Hold

38

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.7Profit: 4.5Value: 4.3Quality: 8.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 3.02

NTRA

Avoid

31

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 8.0Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 6.8
Piotroski: 3/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FONRSignificantly Overvalued (-26.8%)

Margin of Safety

-26.8%

Fair Value

$14.65

Current Price

$19.09

$4.44 premium

UndervaluedFair: $14.65Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for NTRA.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FONR3 strengths · Avg: 9.7/10
Price/BookValuation
0.7x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.0210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Debt/EquityHealth
0.229/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

NTRA2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
38.8%10/10

Revenue surging 38.8% year-over-year

Debt/EquityHealth
0.149/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

FONR4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Market CapQuality
$120.20M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
5.5%3/10

ROE of 5.5% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
6.3%3/10

6.3% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

NTRA4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Price/BookValuation
17.3x4/10

Trading at 17.3x book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-12.8%2/10

ROE of -12.8% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FONR

The strongest argument for FONR centers on Price/Book, Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity.

Bull Case : NTRA

The strongest argument for NTRA centers on Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 38.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FONR

The primary concerns for FONR are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Profit Margin.

Bear Case : NTRA

The primary concerns for NTRA are Price/Book, EPS Growth, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FONR profiles as a value stock while NTRA is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

NTRA carries more volatility with a beta of 1.54 — expect wider price swings.

NTRA is growing revenue faster at 38.8% — sustainability is the question.

NTRA generates stronger free cash flow (18M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

FONR scores higher overall (38/100 vs 31/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Fonar Corporation

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

FONAR Corporation is engaged in the research, development, production, and marketing of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scanners for the detection and diagnosis of human diseases in the United States. The company is headquartered in Melville, New York.

Natera Inc

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

Natera, Inc., a diagnostic company, develops and markets molecular testing services globally. The company is headquartered in San Carlos, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?