WallStSmart

Floor & Decor Holdings Inc (FND)vsUnder Armour Inc C (UA)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Under Armour Inc C generates 6% more annual revenue ($4.97B vs $4.68B). FND leads profitability with a 4.3% profit margin vs -10.0%. UA appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.10. UA earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 41/100 (D).

FND

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 2.7Profit: 4.5Value: 6.0Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.05

UA

Hold

41

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 2.0Profit: 3.5Value: 4.7Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.73
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FNDUndervalued (+15.3%)

Margin of Safety

+15.3%

Fair Value

$81.36

Current Price

$47.41

$33.95 discount

UndervaluedFair: $81.36Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for UA.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FND1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.1x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

UA1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

FND4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.204/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
29.0x4/10

Moderate valuation

Profit MarginProfitability
4.3%3/10

4.3% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
4.5%3/10

Operating margin of 4.5%

UA4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.104/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.734/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Debt/EquityHealth
1.373/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FND

The strongest argument for FND centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : UA

The strongest argument for UA centers on Price/Book.

Bear Case : FND

The primary concerns for FND are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Profit Margin. Thin 4.3% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : UA

The primary concerns for UA are PEG Ratio, Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FND profiles as a value stock while UA is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

UA carries more volatility with a beta of 1.73 — expect wider price swings.

FND is growing revenue faster at -0.7% — sustainability is the question.

FND generates stronger free cash flow (46M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

UA scores higher overall (41/100 vs 40/100). FND offers better value entry with a 15.3% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Floor & Decor Holdings Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · HOME IMPROVEMENT RETAIL · USA

Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. is a multi-channel specialty retailer of hard surface flooring and related accessories. The company is headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia.

Visit Website →

Under Armour Inc C

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · APPAREL MANUFACTURING · USA

Under Armour, Inc. is an American sports equipment company that manufactures footwear, sports and casual apparel. Under Armour's global headquarters are located in Baltimore, Maryland.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?