WallStSmart

Floor & Decor Holdings Inc (FND)vsTriMas Corporation (TRS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Floor & Decor Holdings Inc generates 607% more annual revenue ($4.68B vs $661.54M). TRS leads profitability with a 137.3% profit margin vs 4.3%. TRS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.94. TRS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

FND

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 2.7Profit: 4.5Value: 6.0Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.05

TRS

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 7.5Value: 3.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.35
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FNDUndervalued (+15.3%)

Margin of Safety

+15.3%

Fair Value

$81.36

Current Price

$47.41

$33.95 discount

UndervaluedFair: $81.36Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for TRS.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FND1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.1x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

TRS4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
62.7%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 63 in profit

Profit MarginProfitability
137.3%10/10

Keeps 137 of every $100 in revenue as profit

EPS GrowthGrowth
6896.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 6896.0% YoY

Price/BookValuation
2.1x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

FND4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.204/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
29.0x4/10

Moderate valuation

Profit MarginProfitability
4.3%3/10

4.3% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
4.5%3/10

Operating margin of 4.5%

TRS4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.944/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Market CapQuality
$1.47B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

P/E RatioValuation
116.9x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FND

The strongest argument for FND centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : TRS

The strongest argument for TRS centers on Return on Equity, Profit Margin, EPS Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 137.3% and operating margin at 5.5%. Revenue growth of 10.4% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FND

The primary concerns for FND are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Profit Margin. Thin 4.3% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : TRS

The primary concerns for TRS are PEG Ratio, Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score. A P/E of 116.9x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FND profiles as a value stock while TRS is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

FND carries more volatility with a beta of 1.62 — expect wider price swings.

TRS is growing revenue faster at 10.4% — sustainability is the question.

FND generates stronger free cash flow (46M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

TRS scores higher overall (64/100 vs 40/100), backed by strong 137.3% margins and 10.4% revenue growth. FND offers better value entry with a 15.3% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Floor & Decor Holdings Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · HOME IMPROVEMENT RETAIL · USA

Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. is a multi-channel specialty retailer of hard surface flooring and related accessories. The company is headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia.

Visit Website →

TriMas Corporation

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · PACKAGING & CONTAINERS · USA

TriMas Corporation manufactures and supplies products for the consumer, aerospace and industrial end markets globally. The company is headquartered in Bloomfield Hills, Michigan.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?