WallStSmart

Floor & Decor Holdings Inc (FND)vsKenon Holdings (KEN)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Floor & Decor Holdings Inc generates 436% more annual revenue ($4.68B vs $871.93M). KEN leads profitability with a 7.6% profit margin vs 4.3%. FND trades at a lower P/E of 27.7x. KEN earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 40/100 (F).

FND

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 2.7Profit: 4.5Value: 6.7Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.82

KEN

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 6.7Profit: 4.5Value: 3.0Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.23
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FNDUndervalued (+31.0%)

Margin of Safety

+31.0%

Fair Value

$99.91

Current Price

$51.73

$48.18 discount

UndervaluedFair: $99.91Overvalued
KENSignificantly Overvalued (-39.5%)

Margin of Safety

-39.5%

Fair Value

$54.68

Current Price

$88.89

$34.21 premium

UndervaluedFair: $54.68Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FND1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.3x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

KEN2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
43.1%10/10

Revenue surging 43.1% year-over-year

Price/BookValuation
2.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

FND4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.204/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
27.7x4/10

Moderate valuation

Profit MarginProfitability
4.3%3/10

4.3% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
4.5%3/10

Operating margin of 4.5%

KEN4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
5.1%3/10

ROE of 5.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
7.6%3/10

7.6% margin — thin

P/E RatioValuation
68.0x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-93.7%2/10

Earnings declined 93.7%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FND

The strongest argument for FND centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : KEN

The strongest argument for KEN centers on Revenue Growth, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 43.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FND

The primary concerns for FND are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Profit Margin. Thin 4.3% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : KEN

The primary concerns for KEN are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 68.0x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FND profiles as a value stock while KEN is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

FND carries more volatility with a beta of 1.63 — expect wider price swings.

KEN is growing revenue faster at 43.1% — sustainability is the question.

KEN generates stronger free cash flow (53M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

FND scores higher overall (40/100 vs 40/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Floor & Decor Holdings Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · HOME IMPROVEMENT RETAIL · USA

Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. is a multi-channel specialty retailer of hard surface flooring and related accessories. The company is headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia.

Visit Website →

Kenon Holdings

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Kenon Holdings Ltd., is the owner, developer and operator of power generation facilities in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?