Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT)vsPDD Holdings Inc. (PDD)
FLUT
Flutter Entertainment plc
$100.56
+1.91%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $17.48B
PDD
PDD Holdings Inc.
$77.81
-0.04%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $117.02B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
PDD Holdings Inc. generates 2527% more annual revenue ($450.78B vs $17.16B). PDD leads profitability with a 20.4% profit margin vs -4.4%. FLUT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.19. PDD earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 75/100 (B).
FLUT
Hold46
out of 100
Grade: D+
PDD
Strong Buy75
out of 100
Grade: B
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
-27.2%
Fair Value
$113.45
Current Price
$100.56
$12.89 premium
Margin of Safety
+69.8%
Fair Value
$353.87
Current Price
$77.81
$276.06 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Growing faster than its price suggests
Reasonable price relative to book value
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Conservative balance sheet, low leverage
Generating 25.7B in free cash flow
Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk
Large-cap with strong market position
Every $100 of equity generates 21 in profit
Areas to Watch
3.3% revenue growth
Elevated debt levels
Weak financial health signals
ROE of -9.1% — below average capital efficiency
Weak financial health signals
Earnings declined 11.2%
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : FLUT
The strongest argument for FLUT centers on PEG Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 0.19 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bull Case : PDD
The strongest argument for PDD centers on P/E Ratio, Debt/Equity, Free Cash Flow. Profitability is solid with margins at 20.4% and operating margin at 24.7%. PEG of 0.72 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bear Case : FLUT
The primary concerns for FLUT are Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity, Piotroski F-Score.
Bear Case : PDD
The primary concerns for PDD are Piotroski F-Score, EPS Growth.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
FLUT profiles as a turnaround stock while PDD is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.
FLUT carries more volatility with a beta of 1.07 — expect wider price swings.
PDD is growing revenue faster at 8.1% — sustainability is the question.
PDD generates stronger free cash flow (25.7B), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
PDD scores higher overall (75/100 vs 46/100), backed by strong 20.4% margins. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Flutter Entertainment plc
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · GAMBLING · USA
Flutter Entertainment plc is a sports betting and gaming company in the United Kingdom, Ireland, Australia, the United States, Italy, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Dublin, Ireland.
Visit Website →PDD Holdings Inc.
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · INTERNET RETAIL · China
Pinduoduo Inc., operates an electronic commerce platform in the People's Republic of China. The company is headquartered in Shanghai, the People's Republic of China.
Visit Website →Compare with Other GAMBLING Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?