WallStSmart

Flowserve Corporation (FLS)vsParker-Hannifin Corporation (PH)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Parker-Hannifin Corporation generates 333% more annual revenue ($20.46B vs $4.73B). PH leads profitability with a 17.3% profit margin vs 7.3%. FLS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.72. FLS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 58/100 (C).

FLS

Buy

58

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.7Profit: 6.0Value: 9.3Quality: 6.8
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.92

PH

Buy

54

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 8.5Value: 4.7Quality: 5.8
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.78
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FLSUndervalued (+30.0%)

Margin of Safety

+30.0%

Fair Value

$123.55

Current Price

$76.59

$46.96 discount

UndervaluedFair: $123.55Overvalued
PHSignificantly Overvalued (-435.1%)

Margin of Safety

-435.1%

Fair Value

$186.12

Current Price

$921.56

$735.44 premium

UndervaluedFair: $186.12Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FLS0 strengths · Avg: 0/10

No standout strengths identified

PH3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Market CapQuality
$116.70B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
25.8%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 26 in profit

Operating MarginProfitability
21.7%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 21.7%

Areas to Watch

FLS4 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.724/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
28.6x4/10

Moderate valuation

Revenue GrowthGrowth
3.5%4/10

3.5% revenue growth

EPS GrowthGrowth
2.8%4/10

2.8% earnings growth

PH4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
33.8x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
8.1x4/10

Trading at 8.1x book value

PEG RatioValuation
3.632/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-9.0%2/10

Earnings declined 9.0%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FLS

FLS has a balanced fundamental profile.

Bull Case : PH

The strongest argument for PH centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 17.3% and operating margin at 21.7%.

Bear Case : FLS

The primary concerns for FLS are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Revenue Growth.

Bear Case : PH

The primary concerns for PH are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, PEG Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FLS profiles as a value stock while PH is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

FLS carries more volatility with a beta of 1.28 — expect wider price swings.

PH is growing revenue faster at 9.1% — sustainability is the question.

PH generates stronger free cash flow (768M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

FLS scores higher overall (58/100 vs 54/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Flowserve Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY · USA

Flowserve Corporation designs, develops, manufactures, distributes and services industrial flow management equipment in the United States, Canada, Mexico, the Middle East, Africa, Asia Pacific and Europe. The company is headquartered in Irving, Texas.

Parker-Hannifin Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY · USA

Parker-Hannifin Corporation, originally Parker Appliance Company, usually referred to as just Parker, is an American corporation specializing in motion and control technologies. Its corporate headquarters are in Mayfield Heights, Ohio, in Greater Cleveland.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?