WallStSmart

Fluor Corporation (FLR)vsOshkosh Corporation (OSK)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Fluor Corporation generates 46% more annual revenue ($15.54B vs $10.61B). OSK leads profitability with a 5.2% profit margin vs -12.9%. FLR appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.10. OSK earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 50/100 (D+).

FLR

Hold

46

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 3.5Value: 5.0Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 3.12

OSK

Hold

50

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 5.5Value: 5.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.82
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FLROvervalued (-8.9%)

Margin of Safety

-8.9%

Fair Value

$50.39

Current Price

$54.90

$4.51 premium

UndervaluedFair: $50.39Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for OSK.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FLR2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.1210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Price/BookValuation
2.8x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

OSK3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Debt/EquityHealth
0.249/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

P/E RatioValuation
17.6x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

FLR4 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
Operating MarginProfitability
3.3%3/10

Operating margin of 3.3%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-94.5%2/10

Earnings declined 94.5%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-324.00M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Profit MarginProfitability
-12.9%1/10

Currently unprofitable

OSK4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
5.2%3/10

5.2% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
6.512/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-7.6%2/10

Earnings declined 7.6%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FLR

The strongest argument for FLR centers on Altman Z-Score, Price/Book. PEG of 1.10 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : OSK

The strongest argument for OSK centers on Debt/Equity, P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Bear Case : FLR

The primary concerns for FLR are Operating Margin, EPS Growth, Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : OSK

The primary concerns for OSK are Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FLR profiles as a turnaround stock while OSK is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

OSK carries more volatility with a beta of 1.26 — expect wider price swings.

FLR is growing revenue faster at 8.8% — sustainability is the question.

OSK generates stronger free cash flow (349M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

OSK scores higher overall (50/100 vs 46/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Fluor Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

Fluor Corporation provides engineering, procurement, construction, manufacturing and modularization, operation, maintenance and asset integrity and project management services globally. The company is headquartered in Irving, Texas.

Visit Website →

Oshkosh Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · FARM & HEAVY CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY · USA

Oshkosh Corporation designs, manufactures and markets specialty vehicles and bodies worldwide. The company is headquartered in Oshkosh, Wisconsin.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?