WallStSmart

Fluor Corporation (FLR)vsOshkosh Corporation (OSK)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Fluor Corporation generates 46% more annual revenue ($15.18B vs $10.43B). OSK leads profitability with a 5.5% profit margin vs 2.3%. FLR appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.10. FLR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 58/100 (C).

FLR

Buy

58

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 5.3Profit: 3.5Value: 5.3Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 3.12

OSK

Hold

49

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 3.3Profit: 5.0Value: 5.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 2.82
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FLROvervalued (-7.3%)

Margin of Safety

-7.3%

Fair Value

$47.29

Current Price

$50.41

$3.12 premium

UndervaluedFair: $47.29Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for OSK.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FLR3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
1427.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 1427.0% YoY

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.1210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Price/BookValuation
2.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

OSK3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Debt/EquityHealth
0.269/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

P/E RatioValuation
15.0x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.8x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

FLR3 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
Profit MarginProfitability
2.3%3/10

2.3% margin — thin

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-8.0%2/10

Revenue declined 8.0%

Operating MarginProfitability
-1.2%1/10

Operating margin of -1.2%

OSK4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.2%4/10

0.2% revenue growth

Profit MarginProfitability
5.5%3/10

5.5% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
3.6%3/10

Operating margin of 3.6%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FLR

The strongest argument for FLR centers on EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score, Price/Book. PEG of 1.10 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : OSK

The strongest argument for OSK centers on Debt/Equity, P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Bear Case : FLR

The primary concerns for FLR are Profit Margin, Revenue Growth, Operating Margin. Thin 2.3% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : OSK

The primary concerns for OSK are Revenue Growth, Profit Margin, Operating Margin.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

OSK carries more volatility with a beta of 1.26 — expect wider price swings.

OSK is growing revenue faster at 0.2% — sustainability is the question.

FLR generates stronger free cash flow (99M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

FLR scores higher overall (58/100 vs 49/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Fluor Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

Fluor Corporation provides engineering, procurement, construction, manufacturing and modularization, operation, maintenance and asset integrity and project management services globally. The company is headquartered in Irving, Texas.

Visit Website →

Oshkosh Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · FARM & HEAVY CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY · USA

Oshkosh Corporation designs, manufactures and markets specialty vehicles and bodies worldwide. The company is headquartered in Oshkosh, Wisconsin.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?